Question

In: Finance

1. Explain Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Theory of Capital Structure under three special cases with the...

1. Explain Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Theory of Capital Structure under three special cases with the equations?

Solutions

Expert Solution

MODIGLIANI AND MILLER THEORY

CASE 1 :

It claims that the company’s capital structure does not impact its value. The value of a company is calculated as the present value of future cash flows, thus, the capital structure does affect it.

Where:

VU = Value of the unlevered firm (financing through equity)

VL = Value of the levered firm (financing through mix of debt and equity)

CASE 2 :

It states that the cost of equity of the company is directly proportional to the company’s leverage level. An increase in leverage level implies higher default probability to a company. Therefore, investors tend to demand a higher cost of equity (return) to be compensated for the additional risk.

Where:

rE = Cost of levered equity

ra = Cost of unlevered equity

rD = Cost of debt

D/E = Debt-to-equity ratio

CASE 3 :

It states that tax shields that result from the tax-deductible interest payments make the value of a levered company higher than the value of an unlevered company. Tax-deductible interest payments positively affect a company’s cash flows. Since a company’s value is determined as the present value of the future cash flows, the value of a levered company increases.

Where:

tc = Tax rate

D = Debt

CASE 4 :

It states that the cost of equity has a directly proportional relationship with the leverage level.

The presence of tax shields affects the relationship by making the cost of equity less sensitive to the leverage level. Although the extra debt still increases the chance of a company’s default, investors are less prone to negatively reacting to the company taking additional leverage, as it creates the tax shields that boost its value.


Related Solutions

Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory...
Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory of capital structure. Do you feel the M&M theory is correct in its findings on the capital structure of a firm? Why or why not?
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
A- Discuss the traditional theory relating to capital structure and the approach by Modigliani and Miller
A- Discuss the traditional theory relating to capital structure and the approach by Modigliani and Miller
The capital structure irrelevance theory proposed by Modigliani and Miller (MM) is often criticized to be...
The capital structure irrelevance theory proposed by Modigliani and Miller (MM) is often criticized to be based on very restrictive assumptions which are unrealistic in the world today. However, the theory is still considered extremely important. (word limit 400) a. Why it is important? b. Illustrate three main assumptions made by MM and discuss how the problems are tackled by alternative capital structure theories.
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in...
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in determining the value of a firm. Outline the arguments they used to reach their positions, including the assumptions underlying those arguments. With reference to relevant academic literature, discuss at least one reason why the M&M hypotheses might not hold in practice for BOTH dividend and capital structure policy.
Modigliani and Miller developed a theory describing a firm’s optimal capital structure, ranging from a basic...
Modigliani and Miller developed a theory describing a firm’s optimal capital structure, ranging from a basic model assuming no corporate taxes, to an intermediate model including corporate taxes, and ultimately a model providing for costs of financial distress. Do you agree or disagree that "all three models are practically applicable in the real world". Justify your comment
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
Modigliani and miller demonstrated that "capital structure does not matter" in a perfect capital market. However,...
Modigliani and miller demonstrated that "capital structure does not matter" in a perfect capital market. However, this statement is at odds due to market imperfections. Explain how market imperfections reshape firm's choice of capital structure.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT