Question

In: Finance

One of the conditions that the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Propositions required was for there to...

One of the conditions that the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Propositions required was for there to be no tax. Discuss i) whether the introduction of tax decreases or increases the value of the company, ii) how much is the increase or decrease expected to be and iii) why this happens.

Solutions

Expert Solution

As per Modigilani Approach Preposition I (With No Taxes), value of the enterprise does not depend on the capital structure of the firm. This preposition assumes no tax environment. The approach assumes that any reduction on cost of debt, in turn increases the cost of equity such that overall cost of capital is unchanged thereby the value of the firm is unchanged.

Cost of Levered Equity = Cost of Unlevered Equity + Debt / Equity (Cost of un-levered equity - Cost of Debt)

Under the Modigilani Approach Preposition I (With Taxes), the value of the firm will increase if the tax picture is considered. Hence value of firm will only increase by the tax portion of debt. The second preposition states that, the cost of equity has a direct relation with the level of debt. As level of debt increases, the default risk increases so does the cost of equity. However, it should be noted that the tax shield available due to taxes makes it less sensitive to changes in level of debt.

Cost of Levered Equity = Cost of Unlevered Equity + Debt (1- Tax)  / Equity (Cost of unlevered equity - Cost of Debt)

Hence we observe that introduction of tax in the working reduces the overall cost of capital of the company.

Value of the firm increases by the amount the debt availed on whose interest tax is deductible. Hence value of firm increases by Debt * Tax Rate


Related Solutions

One of the conditions that the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Propositions required was for there to...
One of the conditions that the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Propositions required was for there to be no tax. Discuss i) whether the introduction of tax decreases or increases the value of the company, ii) how much is the increase or decrease expected to be and iii) why this happens
Describe the main results of Modigliani and Miller Propositions (I and II) for: - 1958 model...
Describe the main results of Modigliani and Miller Propositions (I and II) for: - 1958 model – no taxes, no bankruptcy costs - 1963 model – with taxes, no bankruptcy costs - Tradeoff model – with taxes and bankruptcy costs In total there are 6 results
According to Modigliani-Miller propositions, a firm’s cost of equity in a perfect financial market is determined...
According to Modigliani-Miller propositions, a firm’s cost of equity in a perfect financial market is determined by all of the followings EXCEPT ____. Group of answer choices A. risk-free interest rate B. reward to the total business risk C. reward to the nondiversifiable portion of the business risk D. reward to additional risk added by financial leverage
1. Modigliani and Miller (MM) have two propositions that they present under three different sets of...
1. Modigliani and Miller (MM) have two propositions that they present under three different sets of assumptions, or cases. The first proposition discusses firm value, and the second proposition estimates the WACC. a) In case 1, MM conclude that how you finance a firm “just doesn’t matter”. What are the key assumptions in this model and how does each influence MMs conclusion? Draw and label a graph and explain what happens to the cost of debt, the cost of equity,...
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory...
Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory of capital structure. Do you feel the M&M theory is correct in its findings on the capital structure of a firm? Why or why not?
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it...
The Modigliani–Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) is an influential element of economic theory; it forms the basis for modern thinking on the capital structure of a firm. The MM theorem represents what could possibly be the most important theory in respect of the effects of the Capital structure of a firm and the value of that firm. Despite the enormous efforts by Modigliani and Miller and the entire time spent by numerous scholars critiquing this theory, the MM...
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in...
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in determining the value of a firm. Outline the arguments they used to reach their positions, including the assumptions underlying those arguments. With reference to relevant academic literature, discuss at least one reason why the M&M hypotheses might not hold in practice for BOTH dividend and capital structure policy.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT