Question

In: Economics

Q.After you read Why the Government Is Suing Google New York Times article, please provide a...

Q.After you read Why the Government Is Suing Google New York Times article, please provide a summary of the article and your own assessment of the merit of this case Organize your initial response in heading and subheadings and different paragraphs



Why the Government Is Suing Google
Maybe all Google needed to keep from acting like a monopoly was more effective government oversight.


The U.S. government sued Google on Tuesday claiming that the company is an illegal monopoly. My colleagues called it “the government’s most significant legal challenge to a tech company’s market power in a generation.”
This legal case is going to be loud, confusing and will most likely drag on for years. More confusing lawsuits against Google from U.S. states are probably coming, too. What will be most important to remember are the big questions at the heart of this: Does Google break the rules to stay on top? And if so, does that hurt all of us?
So, yes, this is about politics and legal minutiae, but ultimately this case boils down to whether the technology that we use could be better, and whether the American economy could be more fair.
And through all this drama, I have a lingering question: Is the government suing Google because the government itself wasn’t doing its job?

All of the activity that the Justice Department now says is evidence of Google maintaining an illegal monopoly over search and search advertising has been known for years and could possibly have led to a crackdown by agencies like the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department. Those agencies are responsible for keeping watch on companies for signs of potentially abusive behavior.
And yet, under both Democratic and Republican presidents in recent years, Google faced few substantive government enforcement actions for anything it did that made the company stronger and harder to unseat. If you let your kid act up again and again without consequences, should you be surprised that it keeps happening?


In Tuesday’s lawsuit, the Justice Department accused Google of shutting out rivals through tactics like paying phone companies and others to ensure that Google’s web search engine has a prominent position on Android smartphones and on iPhones. This behavior, the government lawsuit said, holds back competition that could make better products for all of us.
But this activity hasn’t been a hush-hush conspiracy cooked up in underground bunkers at Google headquarters.
We’ve known for years that Google pays Apple billions of dollars each year to make sure its search engine is the one that people encounter on their iPhones and in the Safari web browser. It’s not a secret that Google had contracts with phone companies that required them to include Google apps on smartphones and make its search engine practically inescapable.


The European Union’s antitrust regulators fined Google over similar tactics in 2018. The E.U. required changes to Google’s behavior, although some competitors have said they are ineffective.
Reading the U.S. government’s lawsuit, I was mostly left wondering why it’s happening now. Almost all the substantive allegations about Google abusing its power could have been made — and were — years ago. The E.U. case, which started in 2015, dredged up very similar facts.
Novelty is not required to prove that Google is an illegal monopoly, of course. But still, if the lawsuit is treading on familiar ground, why did it take so long?
And again, could the F.T.C. or the Justice Department have stepped in to ask hard questions about this behavior before now? Would that have slowed Google and prevented the need for a Big Bang and risky lawsuit to try to change what the company does? (Google said on Tuesday that the government’s lawsuit is “deeply flawed,” and that people use its online services because they choose to.)
There are, to be sure, complex legal questions involved here. The government can’t just declare that Google stop doing stuff like this just because it makes the company stronger. But I do wonder if more effective oversight by every corner of the government in the last decade would have done with less fuss what this antitrust lawsuit is trying to do — kept Google from tilting the game to its advantage.
In recent conclusions of a congressional investigation into the power of big technology companies, lawmakers who normally disagree about everything did agree on one thing: America’s antitrust watchdogs have fallen down on the job. (To be fair, Congress should shoulder part of the burden here. It writes the laws that dictate what the F.T.C. and Department of Justice do, and it sets their budgets.)
House members said that the F.T.C. and others too often left unchallenged Big Tech’s pattern of getting more powerful by acquiring competitors, and that the agencies did not crack down when these companies broke the law and their word. I couldn’t agree more.


For one small example, look at what happened in 2013. The F.T.C. said that it was getting harder for people to tell the difference between regular web search results and paid web links on Google’s search engine. This risked hurting both those trying to use the site, and companies that had no choice but to spend more money with Google to get noticed.
The F.T.C. urged Google and others to make it more clear when people were seeing web search results rather than paid links.
What happened since that warning in 2013? Not very much. If anything, it’s gotten even more difficult to tell Google’s ads from everything else.
That’s one small example, and that activity wasn’t highlighted in the Justice Department lawsuit against Google. But it shows that big companies — if their behavior is unchecked — will continue to test the limits of their power.
For more from my colleagues: Steve Lohr explains what you need to know about the lawsuit against Google. And Brian X. Chen writes about how Google’s changes over the years have kept us in the company’s infinite loop.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Google could be an international technology company that offers Internet-related services and merchandise, that embrace on-line advertising technologies, a probe engine, cloud computing, software, and hardware.

Here, According to this article, the U.S. government sued Google. He sued to google as a result of in keeping with him google produce an illegal monopoly within the economy. Google maintaining Associate in Nursing black-market monopoly over search and search advertising. Google pays Apple billions of bucks every year to form positive its computer program is that the one that folks encounter on their iPhones and within the expedition application program. According to the U.S., it holds a back competition that might build higher merchandise for all folks.

According to DoJ Google uses its monumental advertising profits to payphone makers to form positive that Google is that the default computer program on your phone. This pattern, prosecutors say, has helped Google capture nearly ninety % of the computer program market within the U.S

Following advantage under this case

a) although this Government attempt to shield Competition.

b) the Here U.S. tells that Google holding the monopoly market.

c) Google Company offered free services to the individuals.


Related Solutions

Using what you’ve read and viewed please reflect on the New York Times article, Harvard Ideas...
Using what you’ve read and viewed please reflect on the New York Times article, Harvard Ideas on Health Care Hit Home, Hard (Jan. 5, 2015). How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have to bear more of the cost, will they skimp on medically necessary care, curtail the use of less valuable services or both? Is the cost-sharing program instituted at Harvard, in effect, “a pay cut” designed to “come at …the...
Read the article “Nintendo Slashes U.S. Price of GameCube,” published in the New York Times, September...
Read the article “Nintendo Slashes U.S. Price of GameCube,” published in the New York Times, September 24, 2003. What type of price discrimination was applied by the company? What were the available conditions that made the discrimination possible?
An article in the New York times states that there is a shocking new way to...
An article in the New York times states that there is a shocking new way to lose weight. A new wearable device called Pavlok claims it is successful in helping people lose weight. Here is how it works, whenever the wearer takes a bite of the foods they want to avoid, like chocolate or Cheez-Its, they use the Pavlok to give themselves a lightning-quick electric shock. “Every time I took a bite, I zapped myself,” one user said. “I did...
a. In an article in the New York Times in 2009, the author makes the following...
a. In an article in the New York Times in 2009, the author makes the following statement: “And whenever the economy begins growing again, it won’t feel good for a while. The unemployment rate may continue to rise into 2010.” Why would the unemployment rate continue to rise if the economy has begun to grow again? (3pts) b. Why isn’t unemployment rate equal to zero when the economy is at full employment? Briefly explain. (3pts) c. If the quantity of...
Please write a short summary of any article of how the New York CITY GOVERNMENT responded...
Please write a short summary of any article of how the New York CITY GOVERNMENT responded to Crisis that affected a Business or Industry in a NEGATIVE way. In your own words please, don't copy and paste.
• Review the article “What is a philosopher?” from the New York Times by the contemporary...
• Review the article “What is a philosopher?” from the New York Times by the contemporary philosopher Simon Critchley. Based on this reading and the others, how and why does the philosopher differ from the lawyer in the philosophical writing of Plato? Do you agree with the distinction? What makes them so different and which one can you relate to the best
"The New York Times" Newspaper article by By Neil Irwin "Why the U.S.-China Trade War Could...
"The New York Times" Newspaper article by By Neil Irwin "Why the U.S.-China Trade War Could Be Long and Painful...". Can you analysis the article for my International business class. Please
select an article from newspapers or journals (example: The New York Times, The Economist, Financial Times,...
select an article from newspapers or journals (example: The New York Times, The Economist, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.) that relate to a Microeconomic concept that we are studying in this class. The story obviously need not be directly about economic theory but can contain ideas that relate to the concepts being studied, or can be analyzed using economic principles. In particular you will find many stories that relate to the last few chapters on international issues, global markets,...
Circle the correct answer : An article in the New York Times† reported that heart attack...
Circle the correct answer : An article in the New York Times† reported that heart attack risk could be reduced by taking aspirin. This conclusion was based on a designed experiment involving both a control group of individuals that took a placebo having the appearance of aspirin but known to be inert and a treatment group that took aspirin according to a specified regimen. Subjects were randomly assigned to the groups to protect against any biases and so that probability-based...
An article in the New York Times describes Chipotle as "the restaurant chain that has come...
An article in the New York Times describes Chipotle as "the restaurant chain that has come to symbolize the tastes of the millennial generation" and lists the sources of Chipotle's success as including the restaurant's allowing "their customers to tailor their meals, and still have them ready in a flash... playing to consumer tastes for customization, speed and ingredients from sources that adhere to animal welfare, organic and other standards." Prepare a document that answer this question. Are these attributes...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT