The process of preparing and using budgets will differ from
organization to organization. However there are number of key
requirements in the design of budgetary planning and control
process.
1) Co-ordination of business as a whole.
2) Participative budeting i.e. bottom-up budgeting.
3) Preparation of The Budet Manual which contain provision of
adequate information to the individuals involved in the planning
process.
4) identification of the principal budget factor.
Forms of budgeting :
- Static budgeting. This is the classic form of
budgeting, where a business creates a model of its expected results
and financial position for the next year, and then attempts to
force actual results during that period to align with the budget
model as closely as possible. This budget format is typically based
on a single expected outcome, which can be extremely difficult to
achieve. It also tends to introduce a great deal of rigidity into
an organization, rather than allowing it to react quickly to
ongoing changes in its environment.
- Zero-base budgeting. A zero-base budget involves
determining what outcomes management wants, and developing a
package of expenditures that will support each outcome. By
combining the various outcome-expenditure packages, a budget is
derived that should result in a specific set of outcomes for the
entire business. This approach is most useful in service-level
entities, such as governments, where the provision of services is
paramount. However, it also takes a considerable amount of time to
develop, in comparison to the static budget.
- Flexible budgeting. A flexible budget model allows you
to enter different sales levels in the model, which will then
adjust planned expense levels to match the sales levels that have
been entered. This approach is useful when sales levels are
difficult to estimate, and a significant proportion of expenses
vary with sales. This type of model is more difficult to prepare
than a static budget model, but tends to yield a budget that is
reasonably comparable to actual results.
- Incremental budgeting. Incremental budgeting is an
easy way to update a budget model, since it assumes that what has
happened in the past can be rolled forward into the future. Though
this approach results in simplified budget updates, it does not
provoke a detailed examination of company efficiencies and
expenditures, and so does not assist in the creation of a lean and
efficient enterprise.
- The rolling budget. A rolling budget requires that a
new budget period be added as soon as the most recent period has
been completed. By doing so, the budget always extends a uniform
distance into the future. However, it also requires a considerable
amount of budgeting work in every accounting period to formulate
the next incremental update. Thus, it is the least efficient
budgeting alternative, though it does focus ongoing attention on
the budget.
- The rolling forecast. A rolling forecast is not really
a budget, but rather a regular update to the sales forecast,
frequently on a monthly basis. The organization then models its
short-term spending on the expected revenue level. This approach
has the advantages of being very easy to update and requiring no
budgeting infrastructure.
Budget which allows changes to be made : - It is flexible
Budget.
A flexible budget is a budget that adjusts or flexes for changes
in the volume of activity. The flexible budget is more
sophisticated and useful than a static budget, which remains at one
amount regardless of the volume of activity.