In: Finance
What is the Community Reinvestment Act? Why do banks complain so much about it?
Answer :
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) is a federal law enacted in 1977 to encourage depository institutions to meet the credit needs of low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA requires federal regulators to assess how well each bank fulfills its obligations to these communities. This score is used to evaluate applications for future approval of bank mergers, charters, acquisitions, branch openings, and deposit facilities.
The CRA was passed to reverse the urban blight that had become evident in many American cities by the 1970s. In particular, one goal was to reverse the effects of redlining, a decades-long practice by which the federal government and banks had actively discouraged and avoided making loans to lower-income and minority neighborhoods.1 The objective of the act was to strengthen existing laws that required banks to sufficiently address the banking needs of all members of the communities they served.
Three federal regulators—the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System—share an oversight role with respect to the CRA. However, the last is chiefly responsible for assessing whether state member banks are fulfilling their obligations under the law.
The Federal Reserve uses one of five methods to rank a bank’s performance based on its size and mission. While a 1995 update to the CRA requires regulators to consider lending and investment data, the evaluation process is somewhat subjective with no specific quotas that banks have to satisfy.
Each bank is given one of the following ratings:
The Fed publishes an online database that members of the public can use to see a particular bank’s score. Banks are also obliged to provide consumers with their performance evaluations upon request.
The CRA applies to FDIC-insured depository institutions, including national banks, state-chartered banks, and savings associations. However, credit unions backed by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund and other non-bank entities are exempt from the legislation.
Criticisms of the CRA:
Critics of the CRA, including a number of conservative politicians and pundits, alleged that the law was a contributing factor in the risky lending practices that led up to the financial crisis of 2008. They alleged that banks and other lenders relaxed certain standards for mortgage approvals to satisfy CRA examiners.
Some economists, however, including Neil Bhutta and Daniel Ringo of the Federal Reserve Bank, argued in 2015 that CRA-based mortgages represented a small percentage of the subprime loans issued during the financial crisis. As a result, Bhutta and Ringo concluded that the law was not a major factor in the housing market’s subsequent downturn.
The CRA has also received criticism that it has not been particularly effective. While low- and moderate-income communities saw an influx of loans after the CRA’s passage, research by the Federal Reserve’s Jeffrey Gunther concluded that lenders not subject to the law—that is, credit unions and other non-banks—represented an equal share of those loans.