In: Civil Engineering
Question 6: Define two concrete mixture performance problems caused by aggregate properties.
Please TYPE your answer, no hand writing. Thank you
There are still a number of challenges facing the Concrete Industry. From a political and social viewpoint, improving the sustainability of concrete construction has to be the first challenge, not because concrete solutions are poor when compared with alternatives, but due to the volume needed for the modern economy.
Uncontrolled Addition of Water on Site
Adding water on site in a controlled manner under the full
responsibility of the concrete producer is not bad practice and it
is a solution to situations where travel time to site is highly
variable or where the exact consistence at discharge is critical,
e.g. diaphragm walling. In this situation the procedure is agreed
between all the parties beforehand and typically some of the mix
water is held back and added on site, followed by mixing at high
speed for the agreed time. The volume of water added is recorded
and samples for testing the consistence and strength are taken from
the re-mixed concrete. The producer remains fully responsible for
the quality of the supplied concrete.
This section is not about this practice, but about the uncontrolled
addition of water to concrete on site. From a supplier's viewpoint,
the specification has been changed by the client instructing the
producer to add more water, but it is questionable whether the
person ordering this change has the authority to do so. If the
producer does not have this instruction and the volume added
written on the delivery ticket and signed, they have little proof
that they were following instructions. What is worse is if the
sample for testing is taken prior to adding water. While the
producer will claim that this sample represents the quality of
concrete supplied to the site, it does not reflect the quality of
concrete in the structure and this is the key concern of owners of
structures.
This issue is one that continues to blight the industry and
resolving it remains one of the challenges facing the Concrete
Industry. The solution may appear simple, ban the practice in the
concrete specification, but this is ineffective if it is not
enforced on site. The one certainty is that nothing will be
recorded on the delivery ticket and if this practice is spotted on
site, the producer will not want to lose a customer and, therefore,
they will work together to claim this was an exception!!!
Achieving the Minimum Cover
Another issue that blights our industry is the lack of the achievement of the specified minimum cover to reinforcement. One of the mantras of the former Cement & Concrete Association, Fulmer Grange, UK was 'halving the cover quarters the life' and this simple message puts the importance of cover into context.
In general, there is little evidence that if a concrete structure achieves the specified minimum cover given in the design code, the concrete conforms to the current recommendations in national standards and it is well compacted and cured, it will not achieve its intended design life. Nevertheless, modern structures are still showing signs of reinforcement corrosion, nearly always due to the lack of the specified minimum cover.
Euro code 2 [15] has addressed one of the issues related to the lack of the minimum cover by clearly distinguishing between nominal cover and minimum cover. The nominal cover is the minimum cover plus a fixing tolerance, typically 10mm but it can be more for concrete cast against the ground and less for certain precast products where the cover is tightly controlled.
Conclusions