Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Correlation does not mean causation. Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal...

Correlation does not mean causation.

Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal article that cites correlational data to make a point. Identify other possible explanations for the correlation that don’t fit with the article’s conclusion

Solutions

Expert Solution

solution:

Baseball and fly sladc Correlation does not Infer causation

See the article 'How stream slack hinders Major League Baseball execution' in volume 114 on page 1407.

This article has been refered to by various articles in PMC

My thought was pulled in to the continuous article by Song at al. entitled "How stream slack incapacitates Major League Baseball execution", by its hardly unpredictable subject and in addition all the more essentially in light of the prevailing fashion that I considered how one could ever truly exhibit the effect of fly slack on baseball execution.

In this paper, Song et al. make sense of how to refine the results gotten by Recht at al as ideal on time as 1995, exhibiting that eastward travel relates with reduced execution. Specifically, by making use of extend bits of knowledge on the particular broad proportion of Major League Baseball record databases available on the web, Song at al found quantifiably critical connections of eastward travel with a couple of elements related to home-amass antagonistic execution, and moreover with "great hammers pemitted" for both home and away gatherings.

In spite of the way that I don't scrutinize the generous proportion of work included and would be well-close unequipped for settling on a choice about the authenticity of the examinations performed, I ought to yield that I was stunned the route Song at aL methockallly present the connections they perceive as prompt proof of causality between fly slack and the affected elements. It is extremely extraordinary to me that 'association" does not appear to be even once in the paper, when this is truly what the scholars have been looking, as I might want to think, to be tentatively correct, the title of the article ought to examine: 'How stream slack partners with deterrents in Major League Baseball execution."

Given the particular broad proportion of composing on associations behveen's fly slack and lessened athletic execution in a whole variety of amusements, I am clearly not discussing that fly slack is the presumably cause for the effects recorded. In addition, looking title of the articles in the reference summary of the Song at al. report this affinity to amalgamate association with causality is clearly to an extraordinary degree visit in this field of examination. In any case, given the wide readership of PNAS and the subject of this article, I feel that it is presumably going to be given off by the press and to attract the thought of various people, the two analysts and nonscientists.

Pondering the present affinity to confuse legitimate data, by methods for the maltreatment of estimations particularly, I feel that a journal, for instance, PNAS should plan to educate by model, and in this manner ought to approve more painstaking quality in the presentation of coherent articles with respect to the difference among connections and exhibited causality.


Related Solutions

Correlation does not mean causation. Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal...
Correlation does not mean causation. Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal article that cites correlational data to make a point. Identify other possible explanations for the correlation that don’t fit with the article’s conclusion.
Correlation does not mean causation. Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal...
Correlation does not mean causation. Look through a newspaper, or a magazine or even a journal article that cites correlational data to make a point. Identify other possible explanations for the correlation that don’t fit with the article’s conclusion.
What does the phrase “Correlation is not causation” mean?
What does the phrase “Correlation is not causation” mean?
To what extent is the statement, “Correlation does mean Causation.” true, and to what extent is...
To what extent is the statement, “Correlation does mean Causation.” true, and to what extent is it misleading? Give examples with your response? 250 words
This week's topic of discussion will be "Does Correlation mean Causation?" Review datasets of your choice...
This week's topic of discussion will be "Does Correlation mean Causation?" Review datasets of your choice from Blackboard or from textbook (Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics 5th edition, chapter 8) and look at highly correlated variables. Explain why (or why not) one variable does not explain the outcome of the other even when they are highly correlated?
Does correlation imply causation? Discuss in your own words.
Does correlation imply causation? Discuss in your own words.
11. If “correlation does not imply causation,” what does it imply? 12. What are some of...
11. If “correlation does not imply causation,” what does it imply? 12. What are some of the possible reasons for large correlations between a pair of variables, X and Y? 17.What assumptions are required for a correlation to be a valid description of the relation between X and Y?
How does regression analysis try to address the issue that correlation isn’t causation?
How does regression analysis try to address the issue that correlation isn’t causation?
Anyone who has studied statistics or research has heard the saying "Correlation does not imply causation."...
Anyone who has studied statistics or research has heard the saying "Correlation does not imply causation." What factors must an analyst consider to decide whether the correlation is meaningful enough to investigate further?
if I have a correlation of 0.05664869 what does that mean
if I have a correlation of 0.05664869 what does that mean
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT