Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The manufacturer of an Engine Energizer System (EES) claims that it improves gas mileage and reduces...

  1. The manufacturer of an Engine Energizer System (EES) claims that it improves gas mileage and reduces emissions in automobiles by using magnetic-free energy to increase the amount of oxygen in the fuel for greater combustion efficiency. Following are test results, performed under international and U.S. government agency standards, on a random sample of 14 vehicles. The data (also see file M09_Gas_Paired.txt) give the carbon monoxide (CO) levels, in parts per million, of each vehicle tested, both before installation of EES and after installation.

Before

After

1.60

0.15

0.30

0.20

3.80

2.80

6.20

3.60

3.60

1.00

1.50

0.50

2.00

1.60

2.60

1.60

0.15

0.06

0.06

0.16

0.60

0.35

0.03

0.01

0.10

0.00

0.19

0.00

  1. Test at the 1% significance level whether, on average, EES reduces CO emissions.

  1. Obtain a 99% confidence interval for the difference between the mean CO emissions before and after installation of EES corresponding to the test in part (a).

  1. Interpret the confidence interval obtained in part (b). Does this interval support the conclusion of the hypothesis test in part (a)? Justify your answer. (4 marks: 2+2)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer a)

Paired Sample t-Test has been used to test the claim. Foll

Thus, at 0.01 significance level, there is enough evidence to claim that on average, EES reduces CO emissions.

Answer b)

Step 1: Find α/2
Level of Confidence = 99%
α = 100% - (Level of Confidence) = 1%
α/2 = 0.5% = 0.005


Step 2: Find tα/2
Calculate tα/2 by using t-distribution with degrees of freedom (DF) as n - 1 = 14 - 1 = 13 and α/2 = 0.005 as right-tailed area and left-tailed area.

tα/2 = 3.01207

Step 3: Calculate Confidence Interval
Confidence Formula: [d̄ - tα/2•(sd/√n) , d̄ + tα/2•(sd/√n)]
Lower Bound = d̄ - tα/2•(sd/√n) = 0.764 - (3.01207)(0.909/√14) = 0.032
Upper Bound = d̄ + tα/2•(sd/√n) = 0.764 + (3.01207)(0.909/√14) = 1.496
Confidence Interval = (0.032, 1.496)

Answer c)

We are 99% confident that the true mean difference between CO emissions before and after installation of EES lies between 0.032 and 1.496

The confidence interval does not contain zero, so null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, this interval support the conclusion of the hypothesis test in part (a).


Related Solutions

The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that theproportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1)(p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2)(p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 115115 of the new racecar engines and 165165 of the old engines. They found that 1212 of the new racecar engines and 66 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1)(p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2)(p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 135135 of the new racecar engines and 175175 of the old engines. They found that 1414 of the new racecar engines and 88 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1) ( p 1 ) , will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2) ( p 2 ) . To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 175 175 of the new racecar engines and 185 185 of the old engines. They found that 16 16 of...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 170 170 of the new racecar engines and 130 of the old engines. They found that 17 of the new racecar engines and 6 of the old engines failed due...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 155 of the new racecar engines and 115 of the old engines. They found that 18 of the new racecar engines and 7 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 120 of the new racecar engines and 115 of the old engines. They found that 77 of the new racecar engines and 44 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 225 of the new racecar engines and 215 of the old engines. They found that 27 of the new racecar engines and 16 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 200 of the new racecar engines and 180 of the old engines. They found that 24 of the new racecar engines and 14 of the old engines failed due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to...
The manufacturer of a new racecar engine claims that the proportion of engine failures due to overheating for this new engine, (p1)(p1), will be no higher than the proportion of engine failures due to overheating of the old engines, (p2)(p2). To test this statement, NASCAR took a random sample of 215215 of the new racecar engines and 200200 of the old engines. They found that 1818 of the new racecar engines and 88 of the old engines failed due to...
A manufacturer claims that the average mileage of his automobiles is at least 25mpg. In a...
A manufacturer claims that the average mileage of his automobiles is at least 25mpg. In a previous study it was found that the standard deviation of the mileage of his automobiles is 3mpg. For a .05 level of significance, what sample size would be recommended if the researcher wants an 80% chance of detecting that is less than 25 miles per gallon when it is actually 24 (to the next whole number)? A. 71 B. 95 C. 56 D. 28
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT