Question

Highlight the arguments for and against impartiality in international mediation? illustrate your arguments with historical examples

Answer 1

The impartiality of International mediation should be understood as if the procedure is followed ste-by- step and with the trust of the participants and their commitment it can lead to most effective measures to the disputes.

But if the same procedure do not involve commitment of the one's participating in it it can't be helpful anymore. Thus, in this procedure even partiality can be done as to bribery, and other corruptive meathods. Thus, to achieve the desired response from the mediator such measures can be applied too. And the true result of the mediation can't be obtained.