In: Statistics and Probability
To illustrate the effects of driving under the influence of alcohol, a police officer brought a DUI simulator to a local high school. Student reaction time in an emergency was measured with unimpaired vision and also while wearing a pair of special goggles to simulate the effects of alcohol on vision. For a random sample of nine teenagers, the time (in seconds) required to bring the vehicle to a stop from a speed of 60 miles per hour was recorded. Complete parts (a) and (b). Note: A normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are appromixately normally distributed with no outliers.
Subject | Normal, X1 | Impaired, Y1 |
---|---|---|
1 | 4.47 | 5.77 |
2 | 4.24 | 5.85 |
3 | 4.58 | 5.45 |
4 | 4.65 | 5.32 |
5 | 4.31 | 5.90 |
6 | 4.83 | 5.49 |
7 | 4.55 | 5.23 |
8 | 5.00 | 5.61 |
9 | 4.79 | 5.63 |
(a) Whether the student had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first was randomly selected. Why is this a good idea in designing the experiment?
A)This is a good idea in designing the experiment because it
controls for any "learning" that may occur in using the
simulator.
B)This is a good idea in designing the experiment because reaction times are different
C) This is a good idea in designing the experiment because the
sample size is not large enough
(b) Use a 95% confidence interval to test if there is a difference in braking time with impaired vision and normal vision where the differences are computed as "impaired minus normal"
The lower bound is ______
The upper bound is _______
(Round to the nearest thousandth as needed)
State the appropriate conclusion
A)There is sufficient evidence to conclude there is a difference in braking time with impaired vision and normal vision
B)There is insufficient evidence to conclude there is a difference in braking time with impaired vision and normal vision
a) Whether the student had unimpaired vision or wore goggles first was randomly selected. Why is this a good idea in designing the experiment?
A)This is a good idea in designing the experiment because it controls for any "learning" that may occur in using the simulator.
b).
The lower bound is 0.669
The upper bound is 1.294
State the appropriate conclusion
A)There is sufficient evidence to conclude there is a difference in braking time with impaired vision and normal vision
----------------------------------Work out---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We shall first calculate the differences and the sd of the difference.
student | X1 | Y1 | diff | diff^2 |
1 | 4.47 | 5.77 | 1.3 | 1.69 |
2 | 4.24 | 5.85 | 1.61 | 2.5921 |
3 | 4.58 | 5.45 | 0.87 | 0.7569 |
4 | 4.65 | 5.32 | 0.67 | 0.4489 |
5 | 4.31 | 5.9 | 1.59 | 2.5281 |
6 | 4.83 | 5.49 | 0.66 | 0.4356 |
7 | 4.55 | 5.23 | 0.68 | 0.4624 |
8 | 5 | 5.61 | 0.61 | 0.3721 |
9 | 4.79 | 5.63 | 0.84 | 0.7056 |
Total | 8.83 | 9.9917 |
The 95% confidence interval for teh difference is therefore