In: Economics
Abstract
Despite the massive scale of state-level budgeting, there currently
exists no theoretically grounded and empirically sound examination
of budgetary tradeoffs at this level of government. In order to
provide such an examination, we extend a well-accepted approach to
tradeoffs at the federal level in order to accommodate the unique
intergovernmental aspects of state-level budgeting. We develop
expectations that need for a good, ideology of state-level
decisionmakers, and the relative amounts of federal grants received
in each expenditure category all influence tradeoff decisions. We
test these hypotheses in an analysis of budgetary decisions in all
50 states between 1971 and 1996.
Journal Information
Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) is a refereed scholarly journal
publishing original research in all areas of political science. PRQ
is published by the University of Utah and is the official journal
of the Western Political Science Association. Most issues also
feature field essays integrating and summarizing current knowledge
in particular research areas. PRQ is published in March, June,
September, and December.
Publisher Information
Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the
dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community.
SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative,
high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800
new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A
growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case
studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and
after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that
secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are
located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC
and Melbourne.