Question

In: Finance

Why are stocks less risky than bonds in the long run?

Why are stocks less risky than bonds in the long run?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Stocks provide greater return potential than bonds, but with greater volatility along the way. Bonds are issued and sold as a safe alternative to the generally bumpy ride of the stock market. Stock involve greater risk, but with the opportunity of greater return.

Bonds in the real world are considered akin to loans. Investors loan funds to companies or governments in exchange for a bond that guarantees a fixed return and a promise to repay the original loan amount, known as the principal, at some point in the future.

Stocks are, in essence, partial ownership rights in the company that entitle the stockholder to share in the earnings that may occur and accrue. Some of these earnings may be paid out immediately in the form of dividends, while the rest of the earnings will be retained. These retained earnings may be used to expand operations or build a larger infrastructure, giving the company the ability to generate even greater future earnings.

Other retained earnings may be held for future uses like buying back company stock or making strategic acquisitions of other companies. Regardless of the use, if the earnings continue to rise, the price of the stock will normally rise as well.

Stocks have historically delivered higher returns than bonds because there is a greater risk that, if the company fails, all of the stockholders' investment will be lost. However, a stock's price will also rise in spite of this risk when the company performs well, and can even work in the investor's favor. Stock investors will judge the amount they are willing to pay for a share of stock based on the perceived risk and the expected return potential—a return potential that is driven by earnings growth.


Related Solutions

A security has a beta of 1.20. Is this security more or less risky than the?...
A security has a beta of 1.20. Is this security more or less risky than the? market? Explain. Assess the impact on the required return of this security in each of the following cases. a. The market return increases by? 15%. b. The market return decreases by? 8%. c. The market return remains unchanged. A security has a beta of 1.20. Is this security more or less risky than the? market????(Select the best choice? below.) A. The security and the...
19.3 Why is the valuation process generally easier to apply to bonds than to stocks?
19.3 Why is the valuation process generally easier to apply to bonds than to stocks?
Why might variable costs be considered less risky than fixed costs? (Fixed costs don’t change in...
Why might variable costs be considered less risky than fixed costs? (Fixed costs don’t change in relation to sales, so they still have to be paid, even if there is no income.) What happens if you don’t sell any cookies one month or sell only a hundred? The riskiness of fixed costs demonstrates why it’s a good idea for entrepreneurs to have a cash reserve in the bank equal to three months of fixed costs.
Which characteristics of bonds make some bonds more risky than others? Why do you think those...
Which characteristics of bonds make some bonds more risky than others? Why do you think those characteristics aff ect a bond’s risk? Provide an example of a Junk Bond and an explanation of why it is considered such.
1. Why do people invest in stocks? Is stock a riskier investment than bonds? Why or...
1. Why do people invest in stocks? Is stock a riskier investment than bonds? Why or why not? How is preferred stock similar to bonds? To common stock? 2. Why would economic growth affect the value of a stock? 3. What are the limitations of the generalized dividend model? 4.What are the risks faced by investors investing in stocks in emerging markets? 5.What is the motivation for buying foreign stocks?
Why is the short run supply curve relatively more inelastic than the long run supply curve?
Why is the short run supply curve relatively more inelastic than the long run supply curve?
True/False? If False, Why? 1_General obligation bonds are less restrictive than revenue backed bonds with few...
True/False? If False, Why? 1_General obligation bonds are less restrictive than revenue backed bonds with few limitations regarding the amount that can be issued. 2_When issuing revenue backed bonds, receipts from all issuing governments sources are pledged to pay the interest and principal back to the bond purchasers. 3_The theory of tax expenditures is what drives the rationale for investors to purchase State/local bonds of either type (general obligation/revenue backed) 4_The Federal American Recovery Act, signed into law by President...
Explain why a firm's long-run total cost is no greater than its short-run total cost. Under...
Explain why a firm's long-run total cost is no greater than its short-run total cost. Under what circumstances will the two be equal? Illustrate both types of total cost in a diagram.
Annual and Average Returns for Stocks, Bonds, and T-Bills, 1950 to 2015. Stocks Long-Term Treasury Bonds...
Annual and Average Returns for Stocks, Bonds, and T-Bills, 1950 to 2015. Stocks Long-Term Treasury Bonds T-bills 1950 to 2015 Average 12.6 % 6.6 % 4.40 % 1950 to 1959 Average 20.9 0.0 2.00 1960 to 1969 Average 8.7 1.6 4.00 1970 to 1979 Average 7.5 5.7 6.30 1980 to 1989 Average 18.2 13.5 8.90 1990 to 1999 Average 19.0 9.5 4.90 2000 to 2009 Average 0.9 8.0 2.70 2010 Annual Return 15.1 9.4 0.01 2011 Annual Return 2.1 29.9...
Annual and Average Returns for Stocks, Bonds, and T-Bills, 1950 to 2015. Stocks Long-Term Treasury Bonds...
Annual and Average Returns for Stocks, Bonds, and T-Bills, 1950 to 2015. Stocks Long-Term Treasury Bonds T-bills 1950 to 2015 Average 12.6 % 6.6 % 4.40 % 1950 to 1959 Average 20.9 0.0 2.00 1960 to 1969 Average 8.7 1.6 4.00 1970 to 1979 Average 7.5 5.7 6.30 1980 to 1989 Average 18.2 13.5 8.90 1990 to 1999 Average 19.0 9.5 4.90 2000 to 2009 Average 0.9 8.0 2.70 2010 Annual Return 15.1 9.4 0.01 2011 Annual Return 2.1 29.9...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT