In: Accounting
Laser Cast, Inc., manufactures color laser printers. Model J20 presently sells for $375 and has a total product cost of $300, as follows:
Direct materials | $220 |
Direct labor | 60 |
Factory overhead | 20 |
Total |
$300 |
It is estimated that the competitive selling price for color laser printers of this type will drop to $360 next year. Laser Cast has established a target cost to maintain its historical markup percentage on product cost. Engineers have provided the following cost reduction ideas:
Purchase a plastic printer cover with snap-on assembly, rather than with screws. This will reduce the amount of direct labor by 9 minutes per unit.
Add an inspection step that will add six minutes per unit of direct labor but reduce the materials cost by $8 per unit.
Decrease the cycle time of the injection molding machine from four minutes to three minutes per part. Thirty percent of the direct labor and 40% of the factory overhead are related to running injection molding machines.
The direct labor rate is $25 per hour.
a. Determine the target cost for Model J20
assuming that the historical markup on product cost and selling
price is maintained. Round your final answer to two decimal
places.
$
b. Determine the required cost reduction. Enter
as a positive number. Round your final answer to two decimal
places.
$
c. Evaluate the three engineering improvements together to determine if the required cost reduction (drift) can be achieved. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. Do not round interim calculations but round your final answers to two decimal places.
1. Direct labor reduction | $ |
2. Additional inspection | $ |
3. Injection molding productivity improvement | $ |
Total savings | $ |
a | TARGET COST FOR MODEL J20 | |||||
PRESENT | AFTER REDUCTION | |||||
PARTICULARS | AMOUNT | PARTICULARS | AMOUNT | |||
SALE PRICE | 375 | SALE PRICE | 360 | |||
LESS:PRODUCT COST | 300 | LESS:MARK UP(SAME MARK UP PERCENT) | ||||
MARK UP | 75 | (360*20%) | 72 | |||
MARK UP PERCENT(75/375*100) | 20% | TARGET COST | $ 288 | |||
b | REQUIRED COST REDUCTION | |||||
PARTICULARS | AMOUNT | |||||
PRESENT PRODUCT COST | 300 | |||||
AFTER PRODUCT COST | 288 | |||||
REQUIRED COST REDUCTION | 12 | |||||
C | DIRECT LABOUR REDUCTION | |||||
DIRECT LABOUR RATE | $25 PER HOUR | |||||
ACTUAL LABOUR COST | $ 60 | |||||
TOTAL TIME TAKEN | ($60*60 MINUTES)/$25=144 MINUTES | |||||
REDUCTION IN TIME TAKEN | 9 MINUTES PER UNIT | |||||
TIME TAKEN NOW | 144 MINUTES-9 MINUTES=135 MINUTES | |||||
NEW LABOUR COST | (135 MINUTES*$25)/60 MINUTES=$56.25 | |||||
SAVINGS IN DIRECT LABOUR REDUCTION | $60-$56.25=$3.75 | |||||
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION | ||||||
DIRECT LABOUR RATE | $25 PER HOUR | |||||
ACTUAL LABOUR COST | $ 60 | |||||
TOTAL TIME TAKEN | ($60*60 MINUTES)/$25=144 MINUTES | |||||
ADDITION IN TIME TAKEN | 6 MINUTES PER UNIT | |||||
TIME TAKEN NOW | 144 MINUTES+6 MINUTES=150 MINUTES | |||||
NEW LABOUR COST | (150 MINUTES*$25)/60 MINUTES=$62.50 | |||||
REDUCTION IN MATERIAL COST | $8 PER UNIT | |||||
ADDITION IN LABOUR COST | ($62.5-$60)=$2.5 PER UNIT | |||||
SAVING IN ADDITIONAL INSPECTION | ($8-$2.5)=$5.5 | |||||
INJECTION MOULDING PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT | ||||||
CYCLE TIME IMPROVEMENT | ||||||
PRESENT | 4 MINUTE PER PART | |||||
TARGET | 3 MINUTE PER PART | |||||
IMPROVEMENT | 1 MINUTE PER PART | |||||
PERCENTAGE OF IMPROVEMENT(1/4*100) | 25% | |||||
DIRECT LABOUR(30%) | $60*30%=$18 | |||||
IMPROVEMENT IN DIRECT LABOUR COST | $18*25%=$4.5 | |||||
FACTORY OH(40%) | $20*40%=$8 | |||||
IMPROVEMENT IN DIRECT LABOUR COST | $8*25%=$2 | |||||
SAVING | ($2+$4.5)=$6.5 | |||||
TOTAL SAVINGS | $(3.75+5.5+6.5) | $ 15.75 | ||||