Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A small study was conducted to test the effect of bright light and melatonin on the...

A small study was conducted to test the effect of bright light and melatonin on the mood, sleep patterns and overall well-being of female dementia patients. The group of patients was given a daily dose of 2.5 mg of melatonin (a hormone that controls circadian rhythm) and exposed to natural sun light and bright fluorescent lights during normal day light hours.

Melatonin

No Melatonin

16

15

18

11

8

12

10

10

16

13

16

14

14

7

8

13

21

12

Listed above are the subjective scores for well-being of the patients during the course of the study and 3 months before the treatments. Assume symmetry.

Analyze appropriately at alpha of 0.05 to determine if there is any significant difference between the effects of bright light and melatonin.


Suppose that you mistakenly believed that the data sets were independent samples taken from two different populations: different female dementia patients were tested for the effects of bright light and melatonin.

Carry out the t test and determine whether you would have found that female dementia patients who were given bright light and melatonin would have a significantly higher subjective scores for well-being.

Explain the cause of any differences in your results when compared to the previous problem.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1)

Ho :   µd=   0                  
Ha :   µd ╪   0                  
                          
Level of Significance ,    α =    0.05       claim:µd=0          
                          
sample size ,    n =    9                  
                          
mean of sample 1,    x̅1=   14.111                  
                          
mean of sample 2,    x̅2=   11.889                  
                          
mean of difference ,    D̅ =ΣDi / n =   2.222                  
                          
std dev of difference , Sd =    √ [ (Di-Dbar)²/(n-1) =    4.8677                  
                          
std error , SE = Sd / √n =    4.8677   / √   9   =   1.6226      
                          
t-statistic = (D̅ - µd)/SE = (   2.222222222   -   0   ) /    1.6226   =   1.370
                          
Degree of freedom, DF=   n - 1 =    8                  

                          
p-value =        0.208028   [excel function: =t.dist.2t(t-stat,df) ]               
Conclusion:     p-value>α , Do not reject null hypothesis                      

there is not any significant difference between the effects of bright light and melatonin.

2)

Ho :   µ1 - µ2 =   0                  
Ha :   µ1-µ2 >   0                  
                          
Level of Significance ,    α =    0.05                  
                          
Sample #1   ---->   Melatonin
mean of sample 1,    x̅1=   14.11                  
standard deviation of sample 1,   s1 =    4.54                  
size of sample 1,    n1=   9                  
                          
Sample #2   ---->   Without Melatonin
mean of sample 2,    x̅2=   11.89                  
standard deviation of sample 2,   s2 =    2.37                  
size of sample 2,    n2=   9                  
                          
difference in sample means =    x̅1-x̅2 =    14.1111   -   11.9   =   2.22  
                          
pooled std dev , Sp=   √([(n1 - 1)s1² + (n2 - 1)s2²]/(n1+n2-2)) =    3.6209                  
std error , SE =    Sp*√(1/n1+1/n2) =    1.7069                  
                          
t-statistic = ((x̅1-x̅2)-µd)/SE = (   2.2222   -   0   ) /    1.71   =   1.302
                          
Degree of freedom, DF=   n1+n2-2 =    16                  

p-value =        0.105693   [excel function: =T.DIST.RT(t stat,df) ]              
Conclusion:     p-value>α , Do not reject null hypothesis                      
               

there is not any significant difference between the effects of bright light and melatonin.

Thanks in advance!

revert back for doubt

Please upvote


Related Solutions

Does daily exposure to bright light make subjects more alert? A study was conducted in which...
Does daily exposure to bright light make subjects more alert? A study was conducted in which the daily habits of 60 college students were documented, focusing on how much time they spent in brightly lit rooms or outside on sunny days. After a week, the subjects were given a computer-based alertness test on which they received a score on a 0 to 100 point scale. Their scores were compared with how much time they spent in brightly lit places that...
A small pilot study is conducted to investigate the effect of a nutritional supplement on total...
A small pilot study is conducted to investigate the effect of a nutritional supplement on total body weight. Six participants agree to take the nutritional supplement. To assess its effect on body weight, weights are measured before starting the supplementation and then after 6 weeks. The data are shown below. Is there a significant increase in body weight following supplementation? Run the test at a 5% level of significance, assuming the outcome is normally distributed. (enter 1 for “yes”, and...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of different lighting systems and the presence or...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of different lighting systems and the presence or absence of a watchman on the average number of car burglaries per month at a parking garage. The data are in the following table and also in the file GARAGE, where the variables are named BURGLAR, LIGHTING and WATCHMAN. Lighting Watchman Mean Number of Burglaries poor no 2.80 good no 1.00 poor yes 2.40 good yes 0.75 Using the Lenth procedure, find which effect(s)...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The control group received no treatment for the infection, while the other group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p̂1 and p̂2, in the two groups were found to be 0.38 and 0.66, respectively. (a) Is there sufficient evidence to indicate...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p̂1 and p̂2, in the two groups were found to be 0.36 and 0.64, respectively. (a) Is there sufficient...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p?1 and p?2, in the two groups were found to be 0.32 and 0.60, respectively. (a) Is there sufficient...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p?1 and p?2, in the two groups were found to be 0.36 and 0.64, respectively. (a) Is there sufficient...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p̂1 and p̂2, in the two groups were found to be 0.38 and 0.62, respectively. (a) Find the test...
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection....
An experiment was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on a viral infection. After the infection was induced in 100 mice, the mice were randomly split into two groups of 50. The first group, the control group, received no treatment for the infection, and the second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the proportions of survivors, p̂1 and p̂2, in the two groups were found to be 0.4 and 0.60, respectively. Find the test statistic...
A researcher was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on viral infection. The...
A researcher was conducted to test the effect of a new drug on viral infection. The infection was put on a group of mice and the mice was randomly split into two groups, different groups. The first group (control group), received no treatment for the infection. The second group received the drug. After a 30-day period, the number of survivors in the two groups were observed, and the test statistic was calculated to be z  =  1.46. If we wish...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT