In: Statistics and Probability
Ho: R= 0
H1:R≠0
1)
r= 0.44
P value= 0.003
Ans→ since p value is very less than 0.01 or 0.05 ,
This implies that correlation is significan between washing and perfectionisom
2)
r=0.57
P value= 0.0003
Ans→since p value is very less than 0.001 or 0.005
We Reject the null hypothesis R=0
*This implies that correlation is significant between checking and perfectionism at 99.5% level of significance
3)
r=0.28
P value= 0.021
Since p value is less than 0.05 we Reject the null hypothesis.
Yes, there is significant correlation coefficient between washing and checking at 5% level of significance.
Que:.Compute the r2 value for the relationship between washing and perfectionism, then interpret.
Ans→R²= 0.1936
Thus 19.36% variability is explained by the regression line of washing and perfectionism.
Que:Compute the r2 value for the relationship between checking and perfectionism, then interpret
Ans→R²=0.57²=0.3249
Thus 32.49% variability is explained by the regression line of checking and perfectionism.
Que:Compute the r2 value for the relationship between washing and checking, then interpret.
Ans→R²=0.0841
Thus 8.41 variability is explained by the regression line of washing and checking.
Thanks!