Question

Explain the respective outcomes reached by the courts in the following case involving sales of land: Californian Copper Syndicate Ltd v Harris

Please explain following points:

1) Back ground of the case

2) why they are fighting ?

3) what is the court decision ?

4) why court is deciding that way ?

please give the correct answer

Answer 1

1.Background of the case :- Background is the information you discovered that describes why there is a problem this will consist of the facts and figures from authoritavtive sources. Graphs, charts ?, tables, Photos, videos, audio files, and anything that points to the problem is useful here. Quotes from interviews are also good

• introduction. Identify the key problems and issue in the case study

• proposed solution/ changes

• Recommendations

2. Ideas of Vasquez & mansbach, this study argues that scholars must take into account the issues and their salience over which states are in dispute in order. Most of the prominent theoretical approaches explicitly ignore the issues in dispute. Even then only in a limited fashion. Several reasons for this are reviewed, ignoring the decision making level of analysis. The demonstrate that foreign policy behavior varies by issue area and that states are more willing to the fight of issue that they regrad as important. Specific suggestions are offered concerning incorporating issue in research design, identify issue and measuring their Salience.

3. In law, a judgement, also spelled judgement, is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceedings. Judgement also generally provit the court's explanation of why is has chosen to make sure particular court order.

The official decision of a court finally determining the respective rights and claims of the parties to a suit jurisdiction. The authority of a court to hear and decide a legal case.

4. Saw all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the law related to the case to a jury, the jurors decide the facts in the case and render a verdict. If there is no jury., the judge makes a decision on the case. Citizens look to the judiciary to uphold their rights and govt. Look to the courts to interpret laws. A judge will here argument from both sides normally via their lawyers and after all judge take the decision and that way.