Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Tests for use of any particular drug have false positive rates (how often a non-user will...

Tests for use of any particular drug have false positive rates (how often a non-user will test positive) and false negative rates (how often someone who uses the drug will test negative); the false negative rates are typically higher than the false positive rates, when the tests are conducted correctly. Suppose a test with a 5% false positive rate and a 15% false negative rate is being used to screen a population where 1% of people are actually using the drug being tested for. Assume the test is being conducted correctly. Express all probabilities as decimals, rounded to four places.

1. If someone is selected at random from the population, what is the probability they would test positive for the drug? (Note: this is equivalent to asking what proportion of the population would test positive for the drug.)

2. If someone tests negative, what is the probability they are using the drug?

3. If someone tests positive, what is the probability they are not using the drug?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Here,the terms proportion and probability are used interchangeably. So,

Probability of people using drug = 0.01

Probability of people not using drug = 1 - 0.01 = 0.99

false negative means when people were using drug but tested nagative

probability of testing negative, when people are using drug = 0.15

So, probability of testing positive, when people are using drug = 1 - 0.15 = 0.85

false positive means testing positive when people not actaully using drug

probability of testing positive when people are not using drug = 0.05

So, probability of testing negative, when people are not using drug = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95

Now, using the law of conditional probability , P(B/A) = P(A and B)/P(A)   (B/A means B given A)

P (A and B) = P(A) * P(B)

1. P (using drug and tests positive) = P(using drug) * P(tests positive given using drug) = 0.01 * 0.85 = 0.085

Similiarly, P (not using drug and tests positive) = 0.99 * 0.05 = 0.0495

P (has a positive test result) = 0.085 + 0.0495 =  0.1345

2. In same way,

P (using drug and tests negative) = P(using drug) * P(tests negative given using drug) = 0.99 * 0.15 = 0.1485

Similiarly, P (not using drug and tests negative) = 0.01 * 0.95 = 0.095

P (has a negative test result) = 0.1485 + 0.095 =  0.2435

P (using drug giiven that test negative) = P (using drug and testing negative) / P(test negative) = 0.1485 / 0.2435 = 0.6099

3. P (not using drug giiven that test positive) = P (not using drug and testing positive) / P(test positive) = 0.0495 / 0.1345 = 0.3680

Please thumbs up if it was helpful. Thanks.


Related Solutions

The false positive rate for polygraph tests is thought to be unacceptably high. You have been...
The false positive rate for polygraph tests is thought to be unacceptably high. You have been offered a job by a firm who wants you to take a polygraph test. You are aware of the flaws inherent in polygraph testing and don't want to do it. Answer the following questions with regard to a polygraph test, which could be considered a diagnostic test for lying. a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses for this situation? b) What is the...
6. Parametric tests usually have more statistical power than non-parametric tests. True or False 5. A...
6. Parametric tests usually have more statistical power than non-parametric tests. True or False 5. A post hoc test does not need to be performed when an ANOVA produces a statistically significant F value. True or False 4. In the case of a hypothesis t test, population mean is known. True or False
How to understand and compute non parametric tests
How to understand and compute non parametric tests
Are there any tests that distinguish Enterococcus organisms from other Gram positive organisms?
Are there any tests that distinguish Enterococcus organisms from other Gram positive organisms? And what does such a test use that distinguishes them.
Are there any tests that distinguish Enterococcus organisms from other Gram positive organisms?
Are there any tests that distinguish Enterococcus organisms from other Gram positive organisms? And what does such a test use that distinguishes them.
Create a program that will calculate the factorial of any user entered integer. For any positive integer, the factorial is given as
Create a program that will calculate the factorial of any user entered integer. For any positive integer, the factorial is given as: n! = n·(n-1)·(n-2)·.……·3·2·1. The factorial of 0 is 1. If a number is negative, factorial does not exist and this program should display error message. Sample output dialogues should look like these:  Enter an integer: -5 ERROR!!! Tactorial of a negative number doesn't exist  Enter an integer: 10  Factorial = 3628800
When should you use non-parametric tests of statistical significance? When is it inappropriate to use non-parametric...
When should you use non-parametric tests of statistical significance? When is it inappropriate to use non-parametric statistical tests? Describe what is meant by the phrase: "Power of a a statistical test". Are non-parametric statistical procedures as powerful as parametric statistical procedures?
describe the context of how a false positive and a false negative fit into the five...
describe the context of how a false positive and a false negative fit into the five steps of systemic toxicological analysis?
Write a C++ program to allow a user to enter in any positive number greater than...
Write a C++ program to allow a user to enter in any positive number greater than or equal to zero. The program should not continue until the user has entered valid input. Once valid input has been entered the application will determine if the number is an abundant number or not and display whether or not the number is an abundant number. If the user enters in a 0 the program should quit. An abundant number is a number n...
Why are nucleic acid tests more likely to return a false positive than culture based testing...
Why are nucleic acid tests more likely to return a false positive than culture based testing methods?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT