In: Finance
RTE Telecom Inc., which is considering the acquisition of Galaxy Sun Corp., estimates that acquiring Galaxy Sun will result in an incremental value for the firm. The analysts involved in the deal have collected the following information from the projected financial statements of the target company:
Data Collected (in millions of dollars) |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
EBIT | $16.0 | $19.2 | $24.0 |
Interest expense | 5.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 |
Debt | 31.9 | 37.7 | 40.6 |
Total net operating capital | 121.5 | 123.9 | 126.3 |
Galaxy Sun Corp. is a publicly traded company, and its market-determined pre-merger beta is 1.40. You also have the following information about the company and the projected statements:
• | Galaxy Sun currently has a $28.00 million market value of equity and $18.20 million in debt. |
• | The risk-free rate is 3%, there is a 5.10% market risk premium, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model produces a pre-merger required rate of return on equity rsL of 10.14%. |
• | Galaxy Sun’s cost of debt is 5.00% at a tax rate of 30%. |
• | The projections assume that the company will have a post-horizon growth rate of 4.00%. |
• | Current total net operating capital is $118.0, and the sum of existing debt and debt required to maintain a constant capital structure at the time of acquisition is $29 million. |
• | The firm does not have any nonoperating assets such as marketable securities. |
Given this information, use the adjusted present value (APV) approach to calculate the following values involved in merger analysis. (Note: Only round intermediate calculations when entering them as a final answer.)
Value |
|
---|---|
Unlevered cost of equity | |
Horizon value of unlevered cash flows | |
Horizon value of tax shield | |
Unlevered value of operations | |
Value of tax shield | |
Value of operations |
Thus, the total value of Galaxy Sun’s equity is . Suppose RTE Telecom Inc. plans to use more debt in the first few years of the acquisition of Galaxy Sun Corp. Assuming that using more debt will not lead to an increase in bankruptcy costs for RTE Telecom Inc., the interest tax shields and the value of the tax shield in the analysis, will , leading to a value of operations of the acquired firm. The APV approach is considered useful for valuing acquisition targets, because the method involves finding the values of the unlevered firm and the interest tax shield separately and then summing those values. Why is it difficult to value certain types of acquisitions using the corporate valuation model? The acquiring firm usually assumes the debt of the target firm. Thus, old debt with different coupon rates usually becomes a part of the acquisition deal. The acquiring firm immediately retires the target firm’s old debt. Thus, the acquisition deal consists of only new debt in its capital structure. (LOOKING FOR THE VALUE ANSWERS) |
We will find the un -levered beta, using the equation |
Levered beta=Unlevered beta*(1+((1-tax rate)*Debt/Equity) |
1.40=Unlevered beta*(1+((1-0.30)*18.20/28) |
Unlevered beta=1.40/((1+((1-0.30)*18.20/28)) |
0.9622 |
Now ,the unlevered cost of equity= |
RFR+(UnL beta*Market risk premium) |
ie. 3%+(0.9622*5.10%) |
7.91% |
Fig. in mlns | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
EBIT | 16 | 19.2 | 24 |
Tax at 30% | -4.8 | -5.76 | -7.2 |
EAT | 11.2 | 13.44 | 16.8 |
Additions to Net operating capital(Last yr. -Current yr.) | -3.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Unlevered cash flows | 7.7 | 15.84 | 19.2 |
Horizon value of unlevered CFs(19.2*1.04)/(7.91%-4%) | 510.6905 | ||
Total Unlevered cash flows | 7.7 | 15.84 | 529.8905 |
PV F at 7.91%(1/1.0791^Yr.n) | 0.92670 | 0.85877 | 0.79582 |
PV at the Unlevered cost of equity,7.91% | 7.135576 | 13.60291 | 421.6976 |
Unlevered value of operations | 442.436 | ||
Interest Tax shields(Int*30%) | 1.5 | 1.65 | 1.8 |
Horizon value of tax shield at gross cost of debt(1.8*1.04)/(5%-4%) | 187.2 | ||
Total Tax shields | 1.5 | 1.65 | 189 |
PV F at 5.00%(1/1.05^Yr.n) | 0.95238 | 0.90703 | 0.86384 |
PV at the gross cost of debt, 5% | 1.428571 | 1.496599 | 163.2653 |
NPV of Tax shields at gross cost of debt | 166.1905 | ||
Adjusted present value of operations | 608.6265 | ||
Answers for the following from the above calcualtions: | mlns | ||
Unlevered cost of equity | 7.91% | ||
Horizon value of unlevered cash flows | 510.6905 | ||
Horizon value of tax shield | 187.2 | ||
Unlevered value of operations | 442.436 | ||
Value of tax shield | 166.1905 | ||
Value of operations | 608.6265 | ||
Less: value of debt | 29 | ||
the total value of Galaxy Sun’s equity is | 579.6265 |
Suppose RTE Telecom Inc. plans to use more debt in the first few years of the acquisition of Galaxy Sun Corp. Assuming that using more debt will not lead to an increase in bankruptcy costs for RTE Telecom Inc., the interest tax shields and the value of the tax shield in the analysis, will DECREASE , leading to a DECREASE in value of operations of the acquired firm. |
Why is it difficult to value certain types of acquisitions using the corporate valuation model? |
a. The acquiring firm usually assumes the debt of the target firm. Thus, old debt with different coupon rates usually becomes a part of the acquisition deal. |