In: Economics
A firm has hired you as a consultant. Their only concern is to maximize profits. This firm is not in a perfectly competitive industry--they have some control over price. They give you the following information:
We're selling 80 units at a price of $20 and at the end of the day we're currently earning revenues of $1600. Our costs are $2000. It costs us about $25 to produce another unit.
Based on your analysis, what would you advise them to do?
Increase Price and Quantity |
||
Decrease Price and Quantity |
||
Shutdown |
||
Increase Price, Decrease Quantity |
||
Decrease Price, Increase Quantity |
In the given case, the firm is earning losses. Here, net loss = revenue - cost = $20*80 - $2000 = $(1600-2000) = - $400.
If the firm is existing in a competitive market, it will charge P=MC=$25 , thereby, earning revenue of $25*80 = $2000. Then, net profit = revenue - cost = $2000 - $2000 = 0. The firm may either shutdown or continue operations at no profit point.
If the firm is operating like a monopoly having some price control, then it can alter its price and quantity combinations in order to earn maximum profits.
To earn profit, monopoly must charge P>MC i.e, P>25. Now, as price increases , quantity falls. This is because, a monopolist faces downward sloping demand curve. Thus, both option a and b do not hold valid as both price and quantity cannot increase or decrease together. From option e, by decreasing price, monopolist will lose revenue. Hence, option e is also invalid.
The monopolist can increase price (where p>25) and decrease quantity upto the extent that revenue generated is greater than the cost incurred. Suppose, if price charged is $30 and quantity produced is 70 then, revenue earned is 70*$30=$2100 which is greater than cost incurred . Here, the monopolist continue to operate. But if the monopolist produces 60 units at the same price, revenue=$30*60 = $1800. Here, the monopolist will incur loss and must opt for a shutdown.