Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Dr. Marcel was testing a potential treatment for Huntington disease on mice. She bred 46 mice...

Dr. Marcel was testing a potential treatment for Huntington disease on mice. She bred 46 mice that exhibited neurodegeneration (deterioration of the brain), and applied her treatment to 22 of the mice (the remaining 24 received no treatment and were labeled the “control group”). After 6 weeks, she measured the circumference of the brain from all mice. She was interested in testing if the average circumference of the brain differed between the treatment and control groups. Below is a summary of the results.

Treatment Group

Control Group

Mean

1.3 cm

1.6 cm

Standard deviation

0.3 cm

0.5 cm

Number of mice

22

24

What is the correct conclusion based on these sample results? (Assume all conditions have been met).

a.

We will reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level, but fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 2% significance level.

b.

We will reject the null hypothesis at the 10% significance level, but fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.

c.

We will fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.

d.

We will reject the null hypothesis at the 2% significance level, but fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 1% significance level.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Hi dear I have tried to explain as much as possible for me. So please thumbs up if you are satisfied with the answer.


Related Solutions

For the following testing scenario, identify specific ethical considerations or potential violations committed by Dr. Jefferson...
For the following testing scenario, identify specific ethical considerations or potential violations committed by Dr. Jefferson as discussed in your textbook and course manual. From an ethical perspective, please consider what Dr. Jefferson has done well and what she could have done differently. If there is a violation of the Canadian Psychological Ethical Guidelines for Psychologists, provide recommendations for a more ethical practice (i.e., what advice would you give to Dr. Jefferson?) Dr. Jefferson lives and practices psychology in a...
For the following testing scenario, identify specific ethical considerations or potential violations committed by Dr. Jefferson...
For the following testing scenario, identify specific ethical considerations or potential violations committed by Dr. Jefferson as discussed in your textbook and course manual. From an ethical perspective, please consider what Dr. Jefferson has done well and what she could have done differently. If there is a violation of the Canadian Psychological Ethical Guidelines for Psychologists, provide recommendations for a more ethical practice (i.e., what advice would you give to Dr. Jefferson?) Dr. Jefferson lives and practices psychology in a...
Create a profile of a young client with symptoms associated with celiac disease. Identify potential treatment...
Create a profile of a young client with symptoms associated with celiac disease. Identify potential treatment or family management options of celiac disease.
QUESTION 24 A doctor is testing a new drug for treatment of high cholesterol. She uses...
QUESTION 24 A doctor is testing a new drug for treatment of high cholesterol. She uses only male subjects age 44-47 who are in the normal weight range who have no other health problems other than high cholesterol. She gives 50 subjects the new drug and 50 others a fake drug (placebo). Which best describes this experiment.? 1. A controlled, double blind study with independent variable only 2. The placebo is the dependent variable and the drug is the independent...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT