Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A study of the effectiveness of using extracts of St. John’s Wort in treating depression was...

A study of the effectiveness of using extracts of St. John’s Wort in treating depression was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association in April, 2001. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Of the 98 patients in group 1 who received St. John’s Wort, 14 were in remission at the end of the study period. Of the 102 patients in group 2 who received a placebo, 5 were in remission at the end of the study period.

We’d like to construct a two-tailed 99% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of remission in the St. John’s Wort group and that in the placebo group, and interpret it in terms of the problem context.

a. Justify assumptions for your CI.

b. Compute the 99% confidence interval and interpret it:

Now we apply a hypothesis testing.

c. Let p1: proportion of remission in the St. John’s Wort group and p2: proportion of remission in the placebo group. What are the null and alternative hypotheses?

H0:

H1:

d. Justify the assumptions before you compute your test statistic and then compute the test statistic.

e. What is the p-value for this test?

f. What would you conclude from this test at 1% level of significance?

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Extracts of St. John’s Wort are widely used to treat depression. An article in the Journal...
Extracts of St. John’s Wort are widely used to treat depression. An article in the Journal of American Medical Association, April 2001, compared the efficacy of a standard extract of St. John’s Wort with a Placebo in 200 outpatients diagnosed with major depression. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, each with 100 patients; one group received St. John’s Wort, and the other group received Placebo. After 8 weeks, 19 of the Placebo-treated patients showed improvements, whereas 27 of those...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 6.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 9.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). After given the magnet treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 5.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating migraines, 142 subjects were...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating migraines, 142 subjects were treated with acupuncture and 80 subjects were given a sham treatment. The number of migraine attacks for the acupuncture treatment group had a mean of 1.8 and a standard deviation of 1.4. The number of migraine attacks for the sham treatment group had a mean of 1.6 standard deviation of 1.2. A - construct the 95% confidence interval estimeate of mean number of migraine...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of 11.011.0 and a standard deviation of 2.72.7. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.8. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...
n a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 3535 patients...
n a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 3535 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 3535 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 3535 patients had pain scores with a mean...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT