Question

In: Accounting

Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures Assume E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co.'s 10-K report has...

Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures
Assume E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co.'s 10-K report has the following disclosures related to its retirement plans ($ millions).

Pension Benefits
($ millions) 2010 2009
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 22,849 $ 22,935
Service cost 383 388
Interest cost 1,228 1,192
Plan participants' contributions 13 9
Acturarial loss (gain) (728) (244)
Benefits paid (1,544) (1,506)
Amendments -- (1)
Net effects of acquisitions/divestitures 5 76
Benefit obligation at end of year $ 22,206 $ 22,849
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $ 22,249 $ 20,132
Actual gain on plan assets 1,927 3,306
Employer contributions 277 280
Plan participants' contributions 13 9
Benefits paid (1,544) (1,506)
Net effects of acquisitions/divestitures -- 28
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 22,922 $ 22,249
Funded status
U.S. plans with plan assets $ 2,365 $ 892
Non-U.S. plans with plan assets (90) (317)
All other plans (1,559) (1,515)
Total $ 716 $ (940)
Pension Benefits
(in millions)
Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) 2010 2009 2008
Net periodic benefit
Service cost $ 383 $ 388 $ 349
Interest cost 1,228 1,192 1,160
Expected return on plan assets (1,799) (1,648) (1,416)
Amortization of loss 117 227 303
Amortization of prior service cost 18 29 37
Curtailment/settlement (gain) loss -- 3 (1)
Net periodic benefit cost $ (53) $ 191 $ 432
Weighted-avg. assumptions used for net periodic benefit cost for years ended Dec. 31

2010

2009

Discount Rate 5.56% 5.43%
Expected return on plan assets 8.09% 8.18%
Rate of compensation increase 4.32% 4.31%


The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

($ millions) Pension Benefits
2008 $ 1,525
2009 1,507
2010 1,493
2011 1,500
2012 1,500
Years 2013-2017 7,690

HINT: Do not use negative signs with your answers.


(a) How much pension expense (revenue) does DuPont report in its 2010 income statement?

DuPont reports pension Answer

of $Answer

million.

(b) DuPont reports a $1,799 million expected return on pension plan assets as an offset to 2010 pension expense. Estimate what the expected return would have been had DuPont not changed the assumption on the expected return in 2010. (Round your dollar answers to the nearest whole number.)

$Answer

million

What is DuPont's actual gain or loss realized on its 2010 pension plan assets?

Answer

($ million) Answer



(c) What main factors affected DuPont's pension plan assets and pension liability during 2010?

Investment gains and employer contributions increased the plan assets. Service and interest costs increased the pension liability, and actuarial gains and benefit payments reduced the liability. Benefits were paid directly by the company and did not affect plan assets

Investment gains and employer contributions increased the plan assets, and benefits paid reduced plan assets. Service and interest costs increased the pension liability, and actuarial gains and benefit payments reduced the liability.

Investment gains and employer contributions increased the plan assets, and benefits paid reduced plan assets. Service and interest costs decreased the pension liability, and actuarial gains and benefit payments reduced the liability.

Investment gains and employer contributions increased the plan assets, and benefits paid reduced plan assets. Service costs increased the pension liability, and actuarial gains and benefit payments reduced the liability. Interest reflects the amount the company paid to its lenders and did not affect the pension obligation directly.



(d) Which of the following statements best describes what the phrase funded status means? What is the funded status of the 2010 DuPont pension plans?

"Funded status" reveals how much cash the plan has.

"Funded status" refers to the extent to which the plan assets are invested in mutual funds.

"Funded status" reflects the contributions that the company has made to the plan.

"Funded status" is the excess or deficiency of the pension obligation over plan assets.

DuPont's pension plan is Answer

by $Answer

million

(e) DuPont increased its discount rate from 5.43% to 5.56% in 2010. What effect(s) does the increase in the discount rate for determining pension obligations and cost have on the company's balance sheet and its income statement?

An increase in the discount rate reduces the PBO and has no effect on pension cost.

An increase in the discount rate reduces the PBO and increases pension cost.

An increase in the discount rate reduces the PBO and decreases pension cost.

An increase in the discount rate increases the PBO and increases pension cost.



(f) Which of the following statements best describes how DuPont's pension plan affected its 2010 cash flow?

There was no effect on the company's cash flow as all benefit payments are paid from plan assets.

The company's cash flow increased as the increase in pension assets more than offset the increase in the PBO.

The company's cash flow increased by the gains on the plan's investment portfolio and decreased by the benefits paid to plan participants.

The company contributed cash to its pension plan in 2010. This contribution directly affected the company's cash flow.



(g) Explain how the returns on pension assets affect the amount of cash that DuPont must contribute to fund the pension plan.

Asset returns have no effect on DuPont's cash flow because they are recognized in the pension plan and not on the company's financial statements.

Should pension investments decline as a result of a decline in the financial markets, DuPont might be required to increase its cash contribution to the pension plan.

Asset returns have no effect on DuPont's cash flow because increases in the PBO provide whatever financing the plan needs.

Asset returns have no effect on DuPont's cash flow because employee contributions make up any shortfall.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures General Mills, Inc. reports the following pension footnote in its 10-K...
Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures General Mills, Inc. reports the following pension footnote in its 10-K report. Defined Benefit Pension Plan ($ millions) 2013 2012 Change in Plan Assets Fair value at beginning of year $ 4,353.9 $ 4,264.0 Actual return on assets 698.7 56.3 Employer contributions 223.1 222.1 Plan participant contributions 15.2 20.3 Benefit payments (222.6) (203.3) Foreign currency (2.2) (5.5) Fair value at end of year $ 5,066.1 $ 4,353.9 Change in Projected Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation at...
equilibrium quantity 1. The profits of Du Pont de Nemours and Company in 1997 were about...
equilibrium quantity 1. The profits of Du Pont de Nemours and Company in 1997 were about $24 billion Does this mean that Du Pont’s economic profit equaled $24 billion? Why or why not? 2. If the demand curve for wheat in the United States is P = 124 – 4QD where P is the farm price of wheat (in dollars per bushel) and QD is the quantity of wheat demanded (in billions of bushels), and the supply curve for wheat...
Analyzing and Interpreting Pension and Health Care Footnote Assume Xerox reports the following pension and retiree...
Analyzing and Interpreting Pension and Health Care Footnote Assume Xerox reports the following pension and retiree health care ("Other") footnote as part of its 10-K report. Pension Benefits Retiree Health (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Change in Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation, January 1 $ 10,467 $ 10,302 $ 1,592 $ 1,653 Service cost 237 244 17 19 Interest cost 578 732 87 92 Plan participants' contributions 12 13 20 19 Plan amendments 11 (234) -- 31 Acturarial gain (508)...
Mini Exercise M10-17: Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures—PBO and Funded Status YUM! Brands Inc. discloses the...
Mini Exercise M10-17: Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures—PBO and Funded Status YUM! Brands Inc. discloses the following pension footnote in its 10-K report. Pension Benefit Obligation ($ millions) 2015 Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year $1,301 Service cost 18 Interest costs 55 Plan amendments 28 Curtailments (2) Special termination benefits 1 Benefits paid (50) Settlements (16) Actuarial (gain) loss (196) Administrative Expense (5) Benefit obligation at end of year $1,134 Explain the terms “service cost” and...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 Accounts receivable $13,363 $13,832 Footnotes to the company's 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 2013 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $232 $332 $464 Provision for doubtful accounts 46 25 23 Deductions, net of recoveries (89) (125) (155)...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 Accounts receivable $13,363 $13,832 Footnotes to the company's 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 2013 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $232 $332 $464 Provision for doubtful accounts 46 25 23 Deductions, net of recoveries (89) (125) (155)...
Interpreting the Accounts receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) reports the following in its 2010 10-K report....
Interpreting the Accounts receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) reports the following in its 2010 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2010 2009 Accounts receivable, net $18,481 $16,537 HPQ footnotes to its 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2010 2009 2008 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $ 629 $ 553 $ 226 Increase in allowance from acquisition 7 -- 245 Addition...
Interpreting Disclosure on Employee Stock Options Assume Intel Corporation reported the following in its 2008 10-K...
Interpreting Disclosure on Employee Stock Options Assume Intel Corporation reported the following in its 2008 10-K report. Share-Based Compensation Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) . . . Share-based compensation recognized in 2008 was $852 million ($952 million in 2007 and $1,375 million in 2006). We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of options granted under our equity incentive plans and rights to acquire common stock granted under our...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report of Whole Foods Market, Inc., a Texas-based retail grocery chain. Inventories The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined using the dollar value retail last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method for approximately 93.5 % and 92.8 % of inventories in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Under the LIFO method, the cost assigned to items sold is based on the...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report of Whole Foods Market, Inc., a Texas-based retail grocery chain. Inventories The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined using the dollar value retail last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method for approximately 93.5 % and 92.8 % of inventories in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Under the LIFO method, the cost assigned to items sold is based on the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT