Question

In: Economics

there are a large number of cases in the court system today. a lot of them...

there are a large number of cases in the court system today. a lot of them are drug cases and the number of court cases be reduced by allowing low-level drug cases such as first offenses be handled by a ticket rather than a formal charges and a court hearing?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The above statement can be applied when the drug involved holds the minimum legal repercussions.

There are five schedules of drugs, i.e. it is categories in four different sections having a different level of legal actions.

Schedule I: Substances with a high potential for abuse and no medically recognized purpose.

  • Heroin.
  • LSD.
  • Marijuana.
  • Peyote.
  • MDMA/Ecstasy.

Possessing these drugs are completely illegal and involve crime at multiple levels to reach the person possessing it.

So, even at first offence, the case cannot be taken care of by just a ticket.

Schedule II: Drugs that have approved medical uses but still pose a high potential for abuse and dependence.

  • Cocaine.
  • Many opioid pain medications like Vicodin, OxyContin, and methadone.
  • Methamphetamine.
  • Prescription stimulant medications like Adderall and Ritalin.

Having the said drugs also involves the above penalties as there is a risk of abuse involved and obtaining them are illegal without medical approval.

Schedule III: Medications and substances with a lower risk of abuse and dependence than drugs in Schedule II.

  • Tylenol with codeine.
  • Ketamine.
  • Steroids.

Schedule IV: Medications with a low risk of abuse and dependence.

  • Soma.
  • Many benzodiazepines like Xanax and Ativan.
  • Tramadol.

Schedule V: Drugs with the lowest risk.

  • Lyrica.
  • Cough medications containing low codeine levels.

So, the medications having the lower and lowest risk of any kind of abuse can be handled by the way suggested in the question to reduce the number of cases in Court but it cannot be applied to highly risky drugs which are a danger to the person and the society.

Thus, laws can be amended for the same as it will definitely help the court.


Related Solutions

Business law survey: The US Court system is a great system, but can take a lot...
Business law survey: The US Court system is a great system, but can take a lot of time. Some parties have put mandatory arbitration clauses in their contracts. Given what you know about the court system and ADR, share your thoughts on whether Courts should enforce arbitration agreements and force parties to arbitrate instead of using the court system.
What is theFederal Court system? What is the State Court system? What is the difference between...
What is theFederal Court system? What is the State Court system? What is the difference between the two and how can you tell which is which?
Explain why ‘Discovery’ is not carried out in criminal court cases.
Explain why ‘Discovery’ is not carried out in criminal court cases.
Business law, please write a short court cases on cases below. Stephen A. Wheat v. Sparks...
Business law, please write a short court cases on cases below. Stephen A. Wheat v. Sparks J.T. ex rel. Thode v. Monster Mountain. Clark’s Sales and Service v. Smith Browning v. Poirer Sogeti USA v. Scariano Killian v. Ricchetti
In which of the following cases did the court decide that in trying to ascertain whether...
In which of the following cases did the court decide that in trying to ascertain whether a statement is a term or not the relative knowledge of the parties is a relevant consideration? a). Hopkins v Tanqueray (1854) 15CB 130. b). Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 & B 370. c). Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 ALL ER 325. d). All of the answers provided. Thanks for answering!
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation...
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation usually involves the dispute over how costs are allocated to a product or product line that is of interest to the plaintiff. This is particularly an issue when a company produces some products or services for a price-competitive market while other products or services are produced for a governmental unit on a cost-plus or reimbursement basis. Nursing Care Inc., or NCI, operates both a...
What are some of the limits that are placed on who may take cases to court...
What are some of the limits that are placed on who may take cases to court and the types of cases courts will consider? How does this differ between federal and state courts? This is one of the disussion questions in the book: Problems in Healthcare)
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation...
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation usually involves the dispute over how costs are allocated to a product or product line that is of interest to the plaintiff. This is particularly an issue when a company produces some products or services for a price-competitive market while other products or services are produced for a governmental unit on a cost-plus or reimbursement basis. Nursing Care Inc., or NCI, operates both a...
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation...
Cost allocation is often the centerpiece of conflict that is resolved in court cases. The litigation usually involves the dispute over how costs are allocated to a product or product line that is of interest to the plaintiff. This is particularly an issue when a company produces some products or services for a price-competitive market while other products or services are produced for a governmental unit on a cost-plus or reimbursement basis. Nursing Care Inc., or NCI, operates both a...
In a short paragraph each, explain the importance of each of these court cases. Morrissey v...
In a short paragraph each, explain the importance of each of these court cases. Morrissey v Brewer                           Gregg v GA                            Atkins v VA    Roper v Simmons                            Estelle v Gamble                   Johnson v Avery
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT