In: Physics
A spelunker is surveying a cave. She follows a passage 120m straight west, then 270m in a direction 45❝ east of south, and then 280 m at 30❝ east of north. After a fourth unmeasured displacement, she finds herself back where she started.
Let the magnitude of A? be 180m. Let the magnitude of B? be 210m and it's direction be 45 degrees east of south. Let C? have the magnitude 280m and a direction of 30 degrees east of north.
0=A? +B? +C? +D?
D? =?(A? +B? +C? )
Dx=?(?180+210sin45+280sin30)=?108.5m
Dy=?(0?210cos45+280cos30)=?94m
|D|=(?108.5)2+(?94)2?????????????????=144m
D?=arctanDy/Dx=arctan?94/?108.5=41deg
Looking over the answers for the angle of a result vector that sits in quadrant 3 I get two possible answers according to the book (the result of the arctanRy/Rx=41):
?=180+40.9 and ?=??180
The way I approached the problem was to recognize that (in the case of this problem) the x and y component of the resultant were in quadrant 3 and then I just drew an angle 41 degrees to the south of the -x axis. My math corresponded to the ? interpretation. However, I don't understand why there are two different definitions of the resultant angle. I understand they're both basically the same (theta sets the angle in Q1 and rotates it whereas phi is simply the angle) but I can't figure out why you need mention both then.