Question

In: Economics

It is very easy to fault MNCs with exploitative labor conditions in Free Trade Zones throughout...

It is very easy to fault MNCs with exploitative labor conditions in Free Trade Zones throughout the developing world. However, some critical theorists put the blame with those who blindly buy their products. Which position do you think is more accurate and why? Support your position with evidence

Solutions

Expert Solution

Putting blame on buyers may be good in the name of blaming, but actually buyers are just exercising their very fundamental right of buying better for cheaper. Expecting the buyer communities across the world to exercise their moral sense and not buy the products of those countries who are allegedly involved in labour-exploitative practices, will be just a 'high talk' without a practicality.

It is true the exploitative practices against labor is bad but it's worse if such practices are allowed or even endorsed by the state legislation. The countries, mostly the developing ones, which are in the race of producing commodities in big numbers and trying to create a dominating place for themselves in the world ranking, often fall prey to exploiting the labor with terribly low wage rates and working conditions, and thus be able to produce goods at a competitively low cost. This has to be addressed, rather urgently.

For example, we have seen the labour policies in China (a unique example of developing countries) getting too liberal to be justified at times. State laws may turn blind to the unhealthy labor practices in certain cases. How can this be cured when the state itself is allowing it to go like that? If we expect the international forums like United Nations Organization (UNO) and WTO to act upon and play savior, we end up finding that these international forums are again nothing more than the international political platforms influenced and dominated by the countries like China itself. These countries, somehow to an extent, have been successful to use these forums for activating their personal agenda of ruling the world.

So, what is the rescue for labor? Is it asking the buyers to discourage by way of not buying the products from such countries? This idea may not have lasting results, we already spoke about it. Then what is the real solution.

Hard, but it must be accepted. It has been really difficult in the past. In future also, we hope, except the stronger and unbiased international trade forums (like UN and WTO), we do not see a ray of light. All economies of the world must come together and agree about the urgent need of making these international forums really strong and free from the individual biases, lobbying and influential practices.


Related Solutions

Describe the working and living conditions for Sri Lankans who live in free trade zones.
Describe the working and living conditions for Sri Lankans who live in free trade zones.
Name two trade agreements or free-trade zones.
Name two trade agreements or free-trade zones.
.Regional free trade zones are becoming popular. What are the negative and positive aspects of such...
.Regional free trade zones are becoming popular. What are the negative and positive aspects of such trade zones? How will they help or hinder global organizations?
Trade through free trade area is able to reduce barriers to easy exchange that trade can...
Trade through free trade area is able to reduce barriers to easy exchange that trade can grow as a result of specialization and division of labor. With respect to this, explain the concept of free trade area. Also discuss, how free trade area is related with the theory of comparative advantage.
-Should free movement of labor be included in free trade agreements? What are the benefits and...
-Should free movement of labor be included in free trade agreements? What are the benefits and drawbacks? -Why have labor force participation rates been falling for over twenty years?
On the issue of free trade, economists (on average): strongly support. strongly oppose. are very divided....
On the issue of free trade, economists (on average): strongly support. strongly oppose. are very divided. have no opinion. Saltwater economists are: Keynesian economists. prefer greater government intervention in the macro economy. situated primarily on the east coasts and west coast universities. true for all of questions in this problem. The benefit that arises from an increase in an activity is called an incentive. opportunity cost. the marginal benefit. the marginal cost. The birth of economics as an intellectual discipline...
Free trade remains a very controversial pub;ic policy issue. Why do many economists think that free...
Free trade remains a very controversial pub;ic policy issue. Why do many economists think that free trade is economically beneficial? Why do many elected officials and activists oppose free trade. Use what you know about comparative advantage, opportunity costs, and labor markets
"Free trade policies encourage developing countries to continue to use child labor in production and necessarily...
"Free trade policies encourage developing countries to continue to use child labor in production and necessarily increases unemployment here in the United States". Explain why this statement can be debunked as a misconception.
The labor-abundant economy has shifted from being self-sufficient to free trade with the rest of the...
The labor-abundant economy has shifted from being self-sufficient to free trade with the rest of the world. This country satisfies the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem. a). In the short term after the opening of trade, it is impossible to build new factories or install new machinery. However, labor can move between industries. In the early stages after the opening of trade, what will be the wages and capital returns of workers in the export and import competition industries? b). Eventually, new factories...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT