Question

In: Economics

The Ministry of Labour in Cambonesia wants to make workers better-off without incurring additional expenditure by...

The Ministry of Labour in Cambonesia wants to make workers better-off without incurring additional expenditure by the government. To this end, the Minister proposes to increase the wage tax paid by employers (or, firms) in order to finance a wage subsidy to workers. Would this policy achieve the Ministry’s objective? Discuss your analysis and illustrate with an appropriate diagram.

(Hint: It is not necessary to discuss welfare implications involving consumer surplus or producer surplus.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Increasing tax on employers to pay for wage subsidy will increase cost of production for these companies. Economic theories propose that any increase in cost of production results in leftward shift of supply curve, as supply decreases and production decreases, unemployment will increase and government will have to pay more unemployment benefits hence government expenditure will increase and this move may be derogatory for producers, employees and government also. Unemployment also has social costs like increasing crime and social unrest.

refer diagram below in which supply shifts left, price goes up from o1 to p2 and quantity reduces from Q1 to Q2.

However, this move has the potential to generate more revenue and it will decrease fiscal burden o government and it will be able to spend on more merit goods like health and education which will enhance supply side skills and productivity will go up in the long run. If demand is inelastic then producers can pass this additional tax burden on consumers.


Related Solutions

A senator wants to raise tax revenue and make the workers better off. A staff member...
A senator wants to raise tax revenue and make the workers better off. A staff member proposes raising the payroll tax paid by firms and using part of the extra revenue to reduce the payroll tax paid by workers. Would this accomplish the senator’s goal?
Would the recycling workers be better off if we banned their jobs?
Would the recycling workers be better off if we banned their jobs?
A, B, C, D. An employer is better off by hiring workers who are dedicated to...
A, B, C, D. An employer is better off by hiring workers who are dedicated to their employer in the long run. Separately answering as parts A, B, C and D, give and briefly explain four different methods that employers use to employ workers who will be committed to their employer.
Tariffs never make small countries better off, but there are cases where they can make a...
Tariffs never make small countries better off, but there are cases where they can make a large country better off. Draw side-by-side graphs for a good (call it “toothpicks”) where the small country can produce the good at a lower price than the large country. In this problem: SA : P =5 + 1.1Q DA : P =14 − 1.1Q SB : P =2 + 1.1Q DB : P =10 − 1.1Q Note that there is a worked example similar...
Does trade between the United States and Vietnam make the countries better off or worse off?...
Does trade between the United States and Vietnam make the countries better off or worse off? Imagine the USA can make 4,000,000 cars, 1,000,000 textiles, or some combination of the two, while Vietnam can make 150,000 cars, 950,000 textiles, or some combination of the two. Draw and label PPFs, calculate opportunity costs and label specialization as points A, and state and label an efficient, mutually beneficial trade as points B.
Suppose the government wants to help workers in a competitive labour market. Illustrate and explain how...
Suppose the government wants to help workers in a competitive labour market. Illustrate and explain how the government could do this by: a) imposing a minimum wage and b) by providing firms with a subsidy to hire workers. All else equal, which will have the greater impact on affected workers’ wage: a $2:00 increase in the minimum wage or a $2:00 subsidy?
1. When a market is efficient: there are no additional exchanges that can make anyone better...
1. When a market is efficient: there are no additional exchanges that can make anyone better off without someone becoming worse off. a central planner must be involved. total surplus is zero. an increase in price will reduce the deadweight loss. 2. The problem arising in the used car market can be alleviated by providing buyers with more complete information on the condition of a used car. sellers offering warranties. having third parties certify the condition of a used car....
Are we better off because of the Agricultural Revolution? How did it make things worse on...
Are we better off because of the Agricultural Revolution? How did it make things worse on the human race?
We discussed that ( Trade can make everyone better off ) Explain that using example from...
We discussed that ( Trade can make everyone better off ) Explain that using example from local Palestinian environment .
One of the Principles of economics “Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off.” Based on your understanding...
One of the Principles of economics “Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off.” Based on your understanding of this principle, first, explain the fundamental principles of the trade between the two countries. Today we can see that some countries started to impose some restrictions on the flow of goods and services, do you think these practices contradict the principle? Why? I need the answer minimum of 500 words please.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT