1 The side of investor :
The PPP legal framework refers to
all laws and regulations that govern the PPP project cycle.
Governments embarking on PPPs may need to adapt the existing legal
framework to ensure—at minimum—that contracts for the delivery of
public services by a private entity can be entered into. In some
cases, changes may be necessary to introduce PPP-specific processes
and responsibilities. Some governments do so by adapting existing
laws; others introduce specific legislation.
The legal framework for PPP depends
on the legal tradition in the country—common law and civil law are
the two main types. In civil law systems, the operations of
government are codified through administrative law. This code,
combined with other legislation, such as the civil code and the
commercial and public contract codes, establishes legal rights and
processes that apply to PPP contracts. Common law systems are less
prescriptive, with fewer provisions governing contracts in general.
As a result, contracts in common law countries tend to be longer
than in civil law countries; the terms governing the relationship
between the parties tend be specified in greater detail to avoid
ambiguities that may not be easily resolved by reference to
specific jurisprudence.
This section briefly describes and
provides examples of PPP legal frameworks: Scope of the PPP Legal
Framework describes the broad scope of legislation that may affect
PPPs and PPP Laws focuses on PPP-specific legislation. The
following resources provide overview guidance on assessing and
developing the legal and regulatory framework for PPPs:
- Jeff Delmon and Victoria Delmon's
Legal Guide (Delmon and Delmon 2012) reviews key legal issues in 17
countries.
- The World Bank’s PPP Infrastructure
Resource Center (PPPIRC) presents the key features of common and
civil law systems and their impacts on PPP arrangements. It has
useful online tools for assessing the legal environment for PPPs in
various countries (PPPIRC, Legislative Frameworks).
- Annex 2 of the EPEC Guide to
Guidance (EPEC 2011b) has an overview of legal and regulatory
requirements for PPPs in countries with different legal
traditions.
- The World Bank Benchmarking PPP
Procurement 2017 (WB 2016b) presents the procurement framework in
82 economies and evaluates them against internationally recognized
good practices.
- Farquharson et al (Farquharson et
al. 2011, 16–21) sets out key questions that investors and lenders
are likely to ask about the legal and regulatory framework, and
some principles on developing effective frameworks.
- The PPIAF’s online PPP Toolkit for
Roads and Highways (WB 2009a, Module 4) includes a section on
legislative framework that describes the types of enabling law for
PPPs. It includes other laws that typically impact PPP projects in
highway infrastructure.
2 The side of ppp management unit in government
:
- PPP framework should guide
governments and private partners through each step in developing a
PPP, ensuring that projects are well structured and delivered in
line with expectations. The PPP framework will achieve this by
outlining procedures and decision rules for various institutions,
and by ensuring effective public financial management and
oversight.
- A PPP framework should articulate
its objectives. These make explicit what the government wants the
PPP framework to achieve. They also provide a basis for subsequent
evaluation of the framework.
- A good framework will also set out
its scope, that is, the types of projects to which it applies. The
framework may be most effective for certain kinds of projects
within certain sectors. For example, it may not be sensible to have
PPPs of a low value follow the same rigorous procedures as those
that apply to high value PPPs.
- The PPP framework will need to be
developed taking into account the legislative and administrative
contexts. The PPP framework will often be embodied in PPP specific
policy documents or legislation.
- Procedures: What things need to be
done, by whom, in what order, to allow the right decision to be
made and the right actions to be taken? For example, the Appraisal
Phase could set out how a specified agency in government will
gather and process information to assess whether the project would
be best done as a PPP.
- Decision criteria: How will
decisions be made at each step? Again, at the Appraisal Phase, one
criterion should be “whether the public interest will be better
served by doing this as a PPP or as a conventional public sector
project”.
- Institutional responsibilities:
Which entities are responsible for which tasks and objectives? For
example, a specialist PPP unit may be responsible for assessing
whether a project is best done as a PPP or not; the cabinet may be
responsible for making a decision at to whether a project should
proceed as a PPP; the ministry of finance may have a responsibility
to advise on fiscal commitments made to a PPP project.
3 From the side of the banks lending money to spv
:
- The World Bank Group is
committed to helping governments make informed decisions about
improving access and quality of infrastructure services, including,
where appropriate using Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) as one
delivery option. This approach is further enabled by working on:
strengthening data, building capacity, developing and testing
tools, promoting disclosure and encouraging engagement with all
relevant stakeholders.
- The tools presented here
showcase the World Bank Group's efforts in enabling better
decisions around PPPs and empowering better decision making. In
some cases, PPPs are the answer, while in other situations, they
may not be the right approach to deliver infrastructure services.
These tools enable stakeholders to get one step closer to making an
informed decision.