Question

In: Finance

There are two risky investments, Chaser and Steady. Chaser has two equally likely possibilities both with...

There are two risky investments, Chaser and Steady.

Chaser has two equally likely possibilities both with perpetual cash flows. It can have either a good state or a bad state. In the good state, cash flows start at £15m at the end of year one and grow at the rate of 4% every year while in the bad state, cash flows start at £12m at the end of year one and decline at the rate of 2% every year.

The cash flows of Steady will start at £24m at the end of the fourth year and remain at that level forever.

As a measure of the risk in each project the relevant beta of Chaser is 1.5 and of Steady is 0.5. The current base rate (i.e. risk free rate) is 3% per annum and the expected stock market return is 9% per annum. The investment costs are £98m for Chaser and £284m for Steady.

a) Which investment should be preferred according to the Net Present Value criteria?

b) If you could shut down the Chaser investment when the bad state occurs at zero cost, which investment should be preferred according to the Net Present Value criteria?

c) A large multinational is willing to buy the Chaser investment at any time. You are negotiating the price they should pay for it. What is the minimum price you must bargain for to ensure the Chaser investment is worth more than the Steady investment?

can calculations be shown as well

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer to part (a)
Information:
Calculation of required rate of return
Chaser Steady
Risk free rate (Rf) 3.00% 3.00%
Market return (Rm) 9.00% 9.00%
Beta 1.5 0.5
Required Return rate (RR) 12.00% 6.00%
= Rf + (Rm - Rf) Beta
Calculation of NPV of Chaser
Good State Bad State
Cash Flow (Million) £      15.00 £    12.00
Growth Rate 4.00% -2.00%
Required Return rate (RR) 12.00% 12.00%
Cash Flow at DCFF (Million) £    187.50 £    85.71
Possibility 0.5 0.5
Total Cash Inflow expected (Million) £   187.50 £   85.71
Less:- Total Cash outflow (Million) £      98.00 £    98.00
Net Present Value (Million) £     89.50 -£   12.29
Calculation of NPV of Steady
Cash Flow (Million) perpectual start from 4th year end £      24.00
Required Return rate (RR) 6.00%
Cash Flow at DCFF (Million) at end of 4th year £    400.00
Total Cash Inflow expected (Million) today [DCFF/PVF] £   316.84
Less:- Total Cash outflow (Million) £    284.00
Net Present Value (Million) £     32.84
At Net Present Value criteria, Steady Investment is preferrable, beacause in Chaser investment there is uncertainity whether it is good state or bad state. If bad state happens, there would be loss in shareholder's wealth.
Answer to part (b)
If Investor could shut down chaser investment at zero cost when bad state occurs, he can enjoy good state and in part (a) we can see NPV is greater than Steady investment. So investor should chose chaser investment in this case.
Answer to part (c)
Chaser Investment Outflow (Million) £      98.00
NPV of Steady (Million) £      32.84
£   130.84
If negotiated price is above than euro 130.84/- million, chaser investment is worth more than the seady investment.

Related Solutions

S. Townsend Incorporated is considering two equally risky investments: 1. A $25,000 investment in a municipal...
S. Townsend Incorporated is considering two equally risky investments: 1. A $25,000 investment in a municipal bond that yields 5.65 percent 2. A $125,000 investment in a preferred stock that yields 6.1 percent What is the break-even corporate tax rate that makes the company indifferent between the two investments
Consider project S and L, and their projected cashflows. Both projects are equally risky. (Assume cost...
Consider project S and L, and their projected cashflows. Both projects are equally risky. (Assume cost of capital is 10%) Expected after-tax cash flows Expected after-tax cash flows Year(t) Project S Project L 0(today) ($1,000) ($1,000) 1 500 100 2 400 300 3 300 400 4 100 600 Required; Find the NPV of each of the projects. Calculate the B/C ratio In each case state if we should accept the project or not and explain your answer.
Your friend and you are both shopping for car insurance. Suppose you are equally likely to...
Your friend and you are both shopping for car insurance. Suppose you are equally likely to get in a car accident and both of your cars are worth the same. You are less risk averse than your friend. Therefore your friend is willing to pay more for an insurance policy than you that completely covers the loss in case of an accident. True of False?
One of two small restaurants is chosen at random with equally likely probability, and then an...
One of two small restaurants is chosen at random with equally likely probability, and then an employee is chosen at random from the chosen restaurant. Restaurant #1 has 9 full-timers and 6 part-timers. Restaurant #2 has 7 full-timers and 9 part-timers. What is the probability that Restaurant #1 was chosen at random, given that a full-time employee was chosen? Your answers should be rounded to 4 digits after the decimal. a) b) c) d) e)
One of two small restaurants is chosen at random with equally likely probability, and then an...
One of two small restaurants is chosen at random with equally likely probability, and then an employee is chosen at random from the chosen restaurant. Restaurant #1 has 9 full-timers and 6 part-timers. Restaurant #2 has 7 full-timers and 9 part-timers. What is the probability that Restaurant #1 was chosen at random, given that a full-time employee was chosen? Your answers should be rounded to 4 digits after the decimal.
Assume that the last two digits on a car number plate are equally likely to be...
Assume that the last two digits on a car number plate are equally likely to be any of the 100 outcomes{00, 01, 02, ........ 98, 99}. Peter bets Paul, at even money, that at least 2 of the next n cars seen will have the same last two digits. Does n=16 favour Peter or Paul? What value of n would make this a pretty fair bet?
Current Design Co. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S and...
Current Design Co. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S and L. Their cash flows are shown below. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? The required...
. Douglas Controls, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S...
. Douglas Controls, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S and L. Their cash flows are shown below. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...
Assume that boys and girls are equally likely. Find the probability that when a couple has...
Assume that boys and girls are equally likely. Find the probability that when a couple has three children, there is exactly one girl.
Consider n people and suppose that each of them has a birthday that is equally likely...
Consider n people and suppose that each of them has a birthday that is equally likely to be any of the 365 days of the year. Furthermore, assume that their birthdays are independent, and let A be the event that no two of them share the same birthday. Define a “trial” for each of the ?n? pairs of people and say that 2 trial (i, j ), I ̸= j, is a success if persons i and j have the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT