In: Economics
Suppose because of an advertising campaign, which costs $150, the monopoly’s demand curve is: P=32-Q so its MR= 32-2Q
Find the firm’s Profit maximizing Q
A firm maximises it profit where MR = 0. It's the point of
producer's equilibrium. We already know that our MR function is MR
= 32 - 2Q. Only if we put 16 in place of Q, we get a zero MR. Hence
our profit maximising quantity is 16 only. in short: Q = 16.
Find the firm’s Profit maximizing
P.
Let us put the above value of Q in demand function as below:
P=32-Q
P=32-16
P=16
Find the firm’s Profit.
Profit = TR - TC
TC = 150 (advertisment cost, if we think of only 'incremental cost'
here. The question doesn't talk about any cost except advertisement
cost, hence we are considering that only)
TR = Q x P = 16 x 16 = 256
Profit = 256 - 150 = 106
Profit = 106
Was the advertising campaign
successful?
Yes, because the incremental revenue (256) exceeds the incremental
cost (150).
Do you have any suggestions that might turn the
situation around?
Firm can review its decision about incurring advertisement
costs.
Looking closely at the TC function and the demand curve,
explain the effects of the advertising campaign on the
equations
Because of advertising costs incurred, the TC curve will move
upwards. It is so because after advertisement cost are incurred,
TFC curve will move upwards and it will resultantly cause the TC
curve also moving upwards (TC = TFC + TVC). And due to the same
reason, the demand curve will tend to transform into more elastic
than earlier. It's so because advertisement compells the reluctant
but potentail buyers to buy now.