In: Economics
Abby is debating whether she should take a big loan to go to a graduate school or continue whit their daily boring job.
which type of motivational conflict does abby experience above?
How can graduate schools helps people like abby to resolve their motivational conflict to enroll in graduate programs . please list two different stratergies focusing on different aspects?
The background for this answer will be provided by the
Motivation Equation MEVID:
Motivation = [(Expectancy x
Value) / (Impulsivity x
Delay)]
which is to be interpreted as saying that
Motivation is directly (positively) related
to
i) Expectancy or
Probability of Success: We feel more motivated to do something if
there's a realistic chance of succeeding;
^ that's (one explanation for) why students from certain
backgrounds do worse than others: not genetics, but rather
looking around at family / community members and coming to the
subconscious conclusion of inevitable defeat deals a death blow to
the motivation needed to foresake leisure and/or low-skilled
employment and study instead.
ii) Value, or how
much the desired outcome is perceived to be worth it: economics is
the study of incentives, the incentive exists because of desire to
consume Value, more Value translates to stronger incentive.
and Motivation is inversely (negatively) related
to
iii) Impulsivity or
Opportunity Cost: the more options there are for what we could
rather be doing, and the more enticing these options are, the less
motivated we'll be to start one activity (because paralysis by
analysis) and fall into a state of flow doing it (because constant
distracting thoughts have to be controlled using willpower, a
finite resource)
iv) Delay or
intertemporal discounting: The further away in time the desired
outcome is perceived to be, the less motivated we are to put effort
towards it. This explains why we experience a spike in motivation a
week before the exam: now the desired outcome (being able to write
well on the test) is only 168 hours away rather than months
away.
^ David Laibson has talked about this in
discussions on the "pull of instant
gratification"; humans have hyperbolic discounting bias
and choose a smaller immediately-available reward over a
larger-reward that comes with a delay, even if the total value of
that larger reward (even after normal exponential discounting) is
more than the value of the smaller reward; google Stanford
marshmellow experiment for more reading.
------
The last point iv) Delay is most relevant to the question
here.
Abby is biased towards short-run hits of gratification (she's
likely a fellow member of the want-it-now generation, as somebody
once called millenials)
so even if going with higher education will bring significantly
more value to her over time
she's taking (what is called) the Path of Least
Effort
Graduate schools can employ the simplistic modelling of behavior
provided by MEVID to come up with many possible strategies (or
combinations of tactics): pick one component of EVID and brainstorm
a tactic to address it.
Some exampes:
i) Increase Expectancy component
by having a roster of successful alumni across industries and the
world, but also across backgrounds; show that there's something for
everyone, that this is the place where weak students are nurtured
(and not ignored to their own fate).
ii) Increase Value component by
achieving market differentiation i.e. offering side-benefits like
unique campus culture which will not be available anywhere else in
the world; (perceived) scarcity drives up (perceived) Value
iii) Reduce Impulsivity by
offering free-of-cost student counsellors to potential applicant(s)
even before their admission, to sit down and honestly decide
together whether the benefits outweigh the costs given that particular applicant's
short-term and long-term goals. People who do come on board
are the ones who pass through this filter, and are thus committed
candidates by definition - this has network externality benefits
(committed students inspire other students to become committed
themselves)
iv) Reduce Delay by tying up with
corporate entities to offer immersive (and paying) internships;
Northeastern University in the States provides a good example of
execution.
-----
Please leave an upvote if this
helped!