Question

how did Weber and Marx agree and disagree on variables that contribute to determining social class

Answer 1

Karl Marx and Max Weber have diverse perspectives upon social class in contemporary social orders. In Karl Marx's point of view, social class has a two-class framework though Max Weber contended that social class has three measurements of stratification: class, status and gathering.

A "class" is any gathering of people possessing a similar class status. Not at all like Marx's two-class framework, Weber isolated "class" into four classifications: propertied privileged, propertyless intellectual elite (cushy specialists), the insignificant bourgeoisie, and the manual regular workers. A propertied class is put at the best since they possess financial power, social status and political impact. A propertyless scholarly people is an expert class. It was put next on the grounds that they not just have moderately high social status and some political impact, yet additionally have higher position in the work advertise. furthermore, responsibility for types of property than propertied class (e.g. stocks and offers). A trivial bourgeoisie was put third since they have less property proprietorship, less social status and less political impact (e.g. an entrepreneur). The manual average workers was set the last in view of they are generally absence of property possession and lower position in the work market, and they have bring down social status and political impact too.

By partitioning class in view of both the relationship of the methods for creation and the market circumstance, Weber drew out a hypothesis of the presence of "working class" (comprising of White Collar experts and insignificant bourgeoisie) though Marx anticipated a polarization in light of his method for classification. 'Weber saw no confirmation to help the possibility of the polarization. In spite of the fact that there were a few decreases in the quantities of the trivial bourgeoisie (the little property proprietors) because of rivalry from extensive organizations, he contended that they enter office or talented manual exchanges instead of being discouraged into untalented manual workers. Therefore, the 'white collar class' extended to shape a class with most populace, subsequently, contrasts Marx's hypothesis of polarization.

Weber dismissed Marxist's view that lowly insurgency is unavoidable however just a plausibility. He thought there was no point for those individuals sharing a comparable class circumstance to build up a typical personality. On the off chance that manual specialists were disappointed with their class, they would do a progression of activities to battle for what they expected for. These activities might be dissension, make strike move, and so forth which could prompt the annihilation of free enterprise.

Weber contended that political power does not ecessarily get from monetary power. Some case would adequately demonstrate it. Bill Gates is the wealthiest individual everywhere throughout the world, yet he is just an agent that has minimal political influence. George Bush is the leader of U.S.A. that has colossal political power in his own nation and furthermore on the planet, yet his salary is far not as much as Bill Gates.

A 'status' is any gathering of individuals who have comparative social and social interests and basic buyer designs. At the end of the day, individuals who have comparative 'way of life'. Dissimilar to class, which depends on individual monetary circumstance, status would rather include level of regard or social respect controlled by a person. As per Weber, as opposed to classes, status bunches are groups. Individuals perceive each different as having a place with a similar gathering. They are not controlled by monetary circumstance but rather bye the dissemination of social respect. Financial components can be a sort of respect; be that as it may, comparative class position does not need comparable status. Both propertied and propertyless individuals might be individuals from a similar status gathering and make social requests on each other, on the off chance that they share a similar particular style of life.

'The path in which social respect is dispersed in the group is known as the status order.'(Holton, 1989) Since such status arrange existed, extremely strict run of partitioning individuals into various status bunches is unavoidable. Criteria for section into a status gathering may take shapes as sharing of family relationship gatherings or certain levels of instruction. The most common type of a status framework with an abnormal state of conclusion is a rank framework. The rank framework was extreme to the point that it totally avoided untouchables to enter the status aggregate by confining individuals wedding individuals from different status gatherings. Status qualifications are ensured by law and tradition, as well as by religious and races. The world class self-enrollment in present day Britain is additionally a sort of social conclusion. E.g. Those kids whose family has a higher status could go to government funded schools, they are additionally more prone to go to Oxbridge and be utilized in higher positions, for example, judges, senior government employees though youngsters from bring down status couldn't accomplish. .

Class and status gatherings can be contrasted in certain ways in spite of the fact that their circumstances are firmly connected. Monetary possession isn't a dependably a factor of status capability while it is a factor of class capability. Class may comprise of a few status gatherings and the same is valid for the inverse.