In: Psychology
What exactly does Sartre mean when he says that"if God does not exist, then everything is permitted"? Do you agree with him? Why or why not?
At the point when Sartre says that "On the off chance that God
doesn't exist, at that point everything is permitted" he implies
that without God there is no current good law that should guide
individuals and what not to do. He implies that without the
presence of God, individuals would have no inspiration to act in
moral way.
He is alluding to morality, he's adage that on the off chance that
God doesn't exist, at that point anything goes. Who is to reveal to
me that murder is "off-base?" For wrong to exist , right should or
must exist , then only we will get to know the difference. Be that
as it may, who is to mention to me what's correct? Without God
there is no goal good, in this way no off-base. E.g You can't call
a line abnormal except if you have some thought what a straight
line resembles.
I somewhere don't concur with Sartre . Indeed, even with a god
there is no goal morality. Only a substance that forces its will.
On the off chance that you state "god is good" and imply that good
is what lines up with god's will then you simply have a morality
subject to that which god needs. On the off chance that you imply
that the word good has its own inherent significance and god is
characterized by this word, at that point the idea of goodness
rises above this god and doesn't depend on a god. The presence of a
god is unessential to the possibility of target morality.