In: Finance
PART A:
As both good economy and bad economy are equally likely, we are taking a simple average to find out the expected value of the investments.
Project A | Project B | |
Optimistic minus cost | $ 1,50,000 | $ 2,00,000 |
Pessimistic minus cost | $ -1,02,500 | $ -4,00,000 |
Expected Value (Average) | $ 23,750 | $ -1,00,000 |
Looking at these expected values, Project A should be chosen as it has higher expected value.
Incremental Value of Project A over Project B is 23,750-(-100,000) = 123,750.
PART B:
If the company finances the project by half debt half equity, then the cost for shareholders would be 50,000 for both the projects. Here, the interest percentage is not given, hence we assume it is not the decisive factor.
Project A | Project B | |
Optimistic minus cost | $ 2,00,000 | $ 2,50,000 |
Pessimistic minus cost | $ -52,500 | $ -3,50,000 |
Expected Value (Average) | $ 73,750 |
$ -50,000 |
Still, the company should choose Project A, because of its higher expected value.
Incremental Value of Project A over Project B is 73,750-(-50,000) = 123,750.
PART C:
In this case, the choice of debt is not affecting the investment choice. It would have affected the decision if:
· The cost of debt and cost of equity would have been given and the cost of equity was much higher that of debt.
· The expected value of both the projects would be in close proximity. Here, the difference is more than the cost itself. That makes Project A, a clear choice, irrespective of the capital structure. Just because the difference is huge.