Discuss what the archaeological record can tell us about past
societies?
Discuss what the archaeological record can tell us about past
societies?
Solutions
Expert Solution
The archaeological record is the body of physical (not written)
evidence about the past. It is one of the core concepts in
archaeology,the academic discipline concerned with documenting and
interpreting the archaeological record.The archaeological record is
the physical record of human prehistory and history, of why ancient
civilizations prospered or failed and why those cultures changed
and grew. It is the story of the human world.
Components of the archaeological record include: artifacts,
built structures, human impact on the environment, garbage,
stratigraphy, mortuary practices, plant remains, or animal remains.
Artifacts from the archaeological record are usually found in the
ground, and once dug up, archaeologists put data such as
photographs and exact location of the artifact into the
archaeological record.
Bones are sometimes found and included in the archaeological
record. Bones can be from both animals and humans that have died
and been preserved. Bone fragments and whole bones can be a part of
the archaeological record. Plant and organic material found can
also become a part of the archaeological record. Seeds are a common
plant material that are found and included in the archaeological
record. The seeds that archaeologists find are usually those that
were burned during cooking, which helps to preserve them.
Features are also part of the archaeological record, and are
material culture that usually archaeologists are unable to take and
study inside a lab. Features can include burn marks in the ground
from fire pits or mounds and other structures constructed long ago.
Features can also include mounds or other monuments that have been
constructed by other civilizations.
A careful examination of an archaeological site, and the artifacts
and ecofacts it contains, will also tell us much about the
prevailing environmental conditions at the time the society
occupied the site. A careful study will often yield enough data to
indicate the average annual climate, the prevailing flora and
fauna, the farmable crops, and the building materials available to
the culture being studied.
We know that the prehistoric hunters of the West Russian planes
had limited access to raw materials and lived in a cold climate
because they lived in houses made of mammoth skins and bones.
Similarly, we know that early African farmers also had a lack of
building materials in lived in a hot, dry climate as they lived in
pole-and-mud huts with thatched roofs.
Not only can a well preserved archaeological site tell us about
the climate, flora, fauna, and available building materials, but it
can even tell us the time of year a certain event happened. For
example, we know that the funeral of the Eighteenth dynasty
Egyptian pharaoh Tutenkhamun, who ruled from 1333 BC to 1324 BC,
took place in the spring by way of the bouquet of wildflowers laid
on his inner coffin, exceptionally preserved by the dry climate of
the Nile Valley.
An illustration of this kind of preservation is provided by the
discovery in 1991 of the 5,300-year-old frozen remains of a Bronze
Age man by hikers in Italy’s Tyrol Mountains.With the body were a
wooden backpack, a wooden bow, fourteen bone-tipped arrows, and
fragments of clothing. In other instances, a waterlogged
environment, very dry climate, or rapid burial may create
conditions for excellent preservation. Such unique instances
provide archaeologists with a much more complete record than is
usually found.
The soil of a site is also an important record of past
activities and the natural processes that affected a site’s
formation. Fires, floods, and erosion all leave traces in the earth
for the archaeologist to discover. All of these data may yield
important information about the age, organization, and function of
the site being examined. These nonartifactual organic and
environmental remains are referred to as ecofacts.
The archaeologist takes special care to record the contexts in
which archaeological materials are found, the artifacts’ specific
location in the ground, and associated materials.
By itself, a pot may be identified as something similar to
other finds from a specific area and time period, but it provides
no new information. If, however, it and similar pots are found to
contain offerings of a particular kind and are associated with
female burials, a whole range of other inferences may be made about
the past. By removing artifacts from sites, laypersons unwittingly
cause irreparable damage to the archaeological record.
The sophistication of the artifacts and structures uncovered
will indicate a lot about the culture being studied and the time
period in which it thrived. Since the earliest known pottery has
been dated to circa 10,000 BC, if we find pottery, we immediately
know that the site is likely not older than 12,000 years.
Similarly, since cold-hammered metal artifacts only appeared in
the archaeological record about 9,000 years ago, and since fired
metal artifacts only started to appear in the archaeological record
about 6,000 years, at the beginning of the copper age, the presence
of a cold-hammered metal artifact indicates that the site is likely
at most 9,000 years old and the presence of fired metal artifacts
decreases the maximum age of the site to about 6,000 years, 5,000
years for bronze, and about 4,000 years for iron.
In addition to the presence of tools, and the material used in
the tool construction, we can gain insights into the technological
advancement of a society from the structures they built. A society
without a basic understanding of mathematics and engineering cannot
build multi-level free-standing structures or develop precise
astronomical calendars.
Probably the best known example of the ability of
archaeological artifacts to aid us in the decipherment of religious
beliefs is the elaborately decorated and extravagantly filled
Egyptian pyramids that demonstrated the ancient Egyptian's beliefs
in multiple gods and their belief that the pharaoh, who at one
point in Egyptian history was considered to be the incarnation of
Horus in life and of Osiris in death, was the bridge between the
people and the god (Osiris).
The structures and artifacts found at a site can tell us a lot
about the daily lives of the population. Prehistoric rock art in
caves and shelters such as Tsoelike River rock shelter in Lesotho
(South Africa) depicts fisherman in their boat and hunters wearing
ostrich skins, demonstrating that early people in this region spent
a lot of their time fishing and hunting for food. Studies of early
smudge pits from 1,000 AD in the middle and lower Mississippi
Valley, by Binford, tell us that the Native Americans of the region
smoked their animal skins to dry and toughen them for use in their
clothing.
Archaeological records have taught us much about civilizations
from the Paleolithic up until the twentieth century. Cave paintings
and kill sites have told us much about the early hunting and
fishing activities of stone age man and the importance of the
activity in their daily life as it was key to their vary
survival.
What can human brain damage tell us about brain
function? What are the limitations of this technique?
What is a lesion study, and what are its advantages? (minimum 150
words)
Were Native Americans a homogeneous group that would have viewed themselves as part of one large group inhabiting the Americas? What generalizations can be made about Native American societies?
On Jonathan Swift “A Modest Proposal” document, what can
this document tell us about life in the industrializing cities of
England? What sort of people are the urban poor according to
Swift?