Question

In: Statistics and Probability

(Please describe each solution step in detail.) In a study designed to test the effectiveness of...

(Please describe each solution step in detail.)

In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain ,40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain) . After given the magnet treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.1. After being given the sham treatment the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.4 and a standard deviation of 2.5.

a- construct the 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean pain scores for patients given the magnet treatment.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)
Given
X̅ = 12           ....... Sample Mean
n = 40           ....... Sample Size
s = 2.1           ....... Sample Standard Deviation

Since the population standard deviation is unknown, we use the t-distribution

Degrees of Freedom = df = n - 1 = 40 - 1 = 39

For 95% Confidence interval

α = 0.05,      α/2 = 0.025
From t tables of Excel function T.INV.2T (α, degrees of freedom) we find the t value
t = T.INV.2T (0.05, 39) = 2.023
We take the positive value of t

Confidence interval is given by


= (11.3283, 12.6717)

95% Confidence interval is estimate of the mean pain scores for patients given the magnet treatment

OR after rounding to 1 decimal place

95% Confidence interval is estimate of the mean pain scores for patients given the magnet treatment

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are satisfied with the solution, kindly give a thumbs up.


Related Solutions

(Please describe each solution step in detail.) In a study designed to test the effectiveness of...
(Please describe each solution step in detail.) In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain ,40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain) . After given the magnet treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.1. After being given the sham treatment the...
(Please describe each solution step in detail.) When we roll a pair of balanced dice, what...
(Please describe each solution step in detail.) When we roll a pair of balanced dice, what are the probabilities of getting; a) 7 ; b) 11 ; c) 7 or 11 ;   d) 3 ;   e) 2 or 12 ; f) 2, 3, or 12 ?
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 6.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 9.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). After given the magnet treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back? pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0? (no pain) to 100? (extreme pain). After given the magnet? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 5.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham? treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.4. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating migraines, 142 subjects were...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating migraines, 142 subjects were treated with acupuncture and 80 subjects were given a sham treatment. The number of migraine attacks for the acupuncture treatment group had a mean of 1.8 and a standard deviation of 1.4. The number of migraine attacks for the sham treatment group had a mean of 1.6 standard deviation of 1.2. A - construct the 95% confidence interval estimeate of mean number of migraine...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of 11.011.0 and a standard deviation of 2.72.7. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.8. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT