Question

In: Economics

Alice enjoys consuming goods x and y. Where (x,y) is the consumption bundle and 0 <...

Alice enjoys consuming goods x and y. Where (x,y) is the consumption bundle and 0 < α < 1, Alice’s utility is: u(x; y) = x^α*y^(1−α) (a) Originally, Alice has income m = 16, and faces prices px = py = 1, and consumes a bundle at which her utility (subject to her budget) is maximised. Then, py rises to 4. Alice is sadder with the new bundle she chooses, and tells you that her compensating variation is 16: that is, she would need an extra 16 dollars to be as happy at the new prices as she was at the old ones. Assuming Alice is telling you the truth, find α. (b) Find Alice’s equivalent variation.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Assume that Alice consumes two commodities X and Y and the utility function is given by U(X,Y) = X^?Y^(1-?), X?0 and Y?0. Generalized rule indicates that we have the constant budget share demand function X* = (?/? + 1 – ?) ×I/px or simply X* = ? (I/px). Similarly, Y* = (1 – ?/? + 1 – ?)×I/py or simply Y* = (1 – ?)*(I/py)

In our case, I (income) = 16 and px = py = 1. Hence initially the consumption bundle is x* = ? * (16/1) = 16? and y* = (1 – ?)*16/1 = 16 - 16?. Now we are given that compensating variation is $16.

Compensating variation is the amount of money necessary to be given to the consumer to keep her original bundle. There is a change in the price of py from 1 to 4, which means the new bundle of y is y* = (1 – ?)*16/4 or 4 - 4?.

The original bundle was 16 – 16? units of y so at the new price of $4 per unit, this bundle would have required $16 more than the current income and that is why the compensating variation is $6. Find the money necessary to buy the old bundle at new price which is 4* (16 – 16?). This is more than the current income by 16 which means we have

4*(16 – 16?) + 16? – 16= 16

64 – 64? + 16? = 32

32 = 48?

This gives ? = 2/3.

Equivalent variation measures the amount of money given up or needed by the consumer in order the buy the same bundle at the same old prices that entails a new utility. Find the demand function and place them into the utility function. Find the new utility level at the old income and new prices. Set this value equal to the utility function by using the unknown new income and old prices. Solving for the new income. Subtract this level of income from the old income. This is the Equivalent Variation

Demand function for x = (2/3)(I/Px) and demand function for y = (1/3)(I/Px)

Utility function U = x2/3y1/3

U = [(2/3)(I/Px)]^2/3*[(1/3)(I/Py)]^1/3

= (2/9)(I)*(1/Px)^2/3(1/Py)^1/3

U(old income and new price) = (2/9)(16)*(1/1)^2/3(1/4)^1/3 = 2.23986

2.23986 = (2/9)(Inew)*(1/1)^2/3(1/1)^1/3

Mnew = 10.07 or simply $10

Equivalent variation = old income – new income = 16 – 10 = $6.


Related Solutions

Alice enjoys consuming goods x and y. Where (x; y) is the consumption bundle and 0...
Alice enjoys consuming goods x and y. Where (x; y) is the consumption bundle and 0 <a< 1, Alice’s utility is: u(x; y) = xay1-a (a) Originally, Alice has income m = 16, and faces prices px = py = 1, and consumes a bundle at which her utility (subject to her budget) is maximised. Then, py rises to 4. Alice is sadder with the new bundle she chooses, and tells you that her compensating variation is 16: that is,...
Pick an arbitrary consumption bundle (x, y) ∈ R2+ (meaning x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0)....
Pick an arbitrary consumption bundle (x, y) ∈ R2+ (meaning x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0). Draw or describe the better than set (upper contour set), the worse than set (lower contour set) and the indifference set in a graph for the following situations: • I like consuming x, and the more the better. I am completely indifferent to the amount of y that I consume. • As long as my consumption of x is less than x∗, the more...
A Consumer's bundle includes goods X and Y, where good X is an inferior good, and...
A Consumer's bundle includes goods X and Y, where good X is an inferior good, and good Y is a normal good. According to (and only focusing on) the income effect ( and ignoring all other effects) the impact of a price decrease of good X will be a ____________ a. substituting consumption away from Y to good X b. decreased consumption of X c. Increased consumption of X
1.Suppose that a consumer buys only two goods, X and Y. At the current consumption bundle,...
1.Suppose that a consumer buys only two goods, X and Y. At the current consumption bundle, the marginal rate of substitution is 3, the price of Good X is $4, and the price of Good Y is $2. a.How many units of Good Y is the consumer willing to give up to obtain one more unit of Good X? How many units of Good X is the consumer willing to give up to obtain more unit of Good Y? b.How...
A consumer's bundle includes goods X and Y. if and Y are complements, then: a. the...
A consumer's bundle includes goods X and Y. if and Y are complements, then: a. the Engel curve is upward slopping b. both X and Y will increase with a price decrease in X c. you cannot illustrate the effect of a change in price of X on Y using a indifference curve graph
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The...
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The government is considering two alternative taxation policies: (a) taxing good X; (b) putting a lump- sum tax on A. By using a graphical analysis, compare these two taxation policies in terms of “excess burden”.
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The...
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The government is considering two alternative taxation policies: (a) taxing good X; (b) putting a lumpsum tax on A. By using a graphical analysis, compare these two taxation policies in terms of “excess burden”.
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The...
Consider an economy in which an individual (A) is consuming two goods (X and Y). The government is considering two alternative taxation policies: (a) taxing good X; (b) putting a lumpsum tax on A. By using a graphical analysis, compare these two taxation policies in terms of “excess burden”
Cecilia is consuming her optimal consumption bundle of slices of pizza and pepsi cola cans. The...
Cecilia is consuming her optimal consumption bundle of slices of pizza and pepsi cola cans. The marginal utility of her last slice of pizza was 75 utils, and each pizza costs $3. Her marginal utility of her last pepsi cola can was 100 utils. The price of a pepsi cola can is $_____.
Ruby buys goods X and Y. She can just afford the bundle X = 6and...
Ruby buys goods X and Y. She can just afford the bundle X = 6 and Y = 3 and one x will cost her 3 units of y.a. What is the ratio of the price of x to the price of y?b. If Ruby spent all her money on x, how much x could she buy? If she spent all your money on y, how much y could she buy? Show work.c. Write an equation that gives you Ruby's...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT