In: Nursing
Some hospitals concurrently review records for deficiencies; others review retrospectively. Which is the best practice, and why? What are your thoughts about the process of peer review?
Answer: Although some of hospitals concurrently review records for deficiencies; others review retrospectively, the use of the review retrospectively provides huge benefits. The use of the evidence bades practice results in to better results. The some of the benefits of retrospective review as compared to the concurrent reviews as:
The process review are based in the present and future requirements and needs. It identifies the insufficiency and enable to fulfill the demand. It maximizes the ability to deliver quality of care to the present situation.