Question

In: Economics

Discussion Questions 1 ”No country is abundant in everything.” Discuss. 2 If Japan is relatively capital...

Discussion Questions

  1. 1 ”No country is abundant in everything.” Discuss.

  2. 2 If Japan is relatively capital rich and the US is relatively land rich, and if food is relatively land intensive, what happens to price when these formerly autarkic countries trade?

    • global price of food
    • relative price of food in the US, Japan

  3. 3 Why is it that North-South trade in manufactures seems to be consistent with the results or expectations generated by the factor-proportions theory of international trade, (whereas North-North trade might not)?

  4. 4 Europe is capital abundant and Africa is labor abundant. Manufactures is capital intensive and food is labor intensive. If the two regions trade, discuss changes in prices of goods, prices of factors and distribution implications.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer 1

Hecksher Ohlin model is a general equilibrium theory in internantional trade. It always focuses on two factors of production - capital and labour. It focuses on only two countries. According to this theory no country is abundant in every thing. In certain countries work force is avaible, the shortge of raw materials and natural resources will not be enough. On the other hand in certain other geographicl areas there will be abundance of natural resources and raw materials there will not be sufficieint work force. Developing countries and under developed countries are suffering shortge of wealth.

This is the time we have to think about international trade . According to this theory those countries which are capital rich can export those goods which required more capital for production. On the oher hand the other country which is labour rich can produce such items for which more man power is required and export it to those countries they are capital rich and not labour rich.

Answer 2

Political events, global demand, war, diseases, natural disasters, geographical and environmental conditions, soil, etc. determines the increase or decrese in the prices of food. Demand for food based on income growth, population growth, etc, are also factors affecting the prices of food.  

Japan is a country popularly known for its labour force. They are very hard working for less amount of wages. On the other hand US people are dominating in nature and not that much labour oriented. Food is land and labour oriented. Hence if a situation comes in the economy where US is landrich the global price of food will relatively increase. Becuase US is a developed country and it is capital rich. People will get huge amount of money for small amount of work and people are familiar with that. If it becomes land rich immediately it is very difficult to find out skilled work force. If skilled force are available also they will demand for more wages. It will affect the cost of food and it will result a risein food priceglobally.

Relative price of food in US will be comparatively less under this situation, and in the case of Japen it will be high due to additional packaging and transportation charges.

Answer 3

From 1980s we can see the nature of international trade is focused between north - south. That is between developed countries which are capital abundant and developing countries which are labour abundant. The trade with China after trade liberalization policy is an example. China a labour rich country, where labour is comparatively very cheap and the quantity of labour is very high, could export a large amount of its products to US.

Answer 4

If Europe and Africa engaged in trade each other Eupope can utilize the man power of africa to convert their inventories into finished goods. This will help Africa to become more economically advanced because of more employment opportunities to their labour force. Europe a capital rich country can also invest more capital on food production field. Hence through international trade Africa will get double benefit. Because of more employment opportunities their gross domestic production will increase. Because of the local work force the cost of production will be less and the products will be available in the market at comparatively lesser price.

Europe on the hand also can attain more by investing more money in a developing country like Africa. where there is manpower is abundant and cheaper. More amount of commodities can be produced with less amount of labour.


Related Solutions

The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume...
The US is a capital abundant country, and Mexico is a relatively labor abundant country. Assume that each country has an apparel industry (labor-intensive) and an automobile industry (capital-intensive). Assume that the two countries are originally in a state of autarky. a) Use PPFs to show the outcomes in autarky. b) Use the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) model to show what will happen when we open up the two countries to free trade with one another. c) What will happened to the...
1.) The US is relatively capital abundant, and India is relatively labor abundant. Assume that the...
1.) The US is relatively capital abundant, and India is relatively labor abundant. Assume that the production of rice is more labor intensive than the production of cars. Suppose there are foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from the US to India,and the FDI is in the car industry. Answer the following questions. a.Explain short-run and long-run effects of the FDI on India's pattern of production, imports and exports. b.How will you answer in Part (a) change if the FDI from...
question 19 Japan and China both produce TVs and shoes. Japan is relatively capital abundant while...
question 19 Japan and China both produce TVs and shoes. Japan is relatively capital abundant while China is relatively labor abundant. In the two countries, the production of TVs is relatively more capital intensive compared to the production of shoes. Given the factor endowment theory, Japan: Has comparative advantage in the production of shoes. Should specialize in and export TVs Has absolute advantage in the production of shoes Absolute advantage in the production of TVs question 20 According to Staffan...
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive.
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive. Assume that Country 1 is a large country and country 2 is a small country.Answer the following questions:a) Suppose that Country I's capital stock increases. Show the pregrowth and after growth production and consumption points on a figure. Clearly explain how the production and consumption of commodity X and...
. Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin...
. Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive...
Suppose that a relatively capital-abundant country is exporting the capital- intensive good and importing the labor-intensive good, but that the “specific- factors” model of Chapter 8 applies rather than the Heckscher-Ohlin model. Assess the effect on the return to labor of the imposition of a tariff on the labor- intensive good.
Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Discuss the statement "No country is abundant in everything." from the perspective of the Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive...
Suppose there are two countries (a capital-abundant country and a labor-abundant country) and two goods (labor-intensive good X and capital-intensive good Y). The two countries have identical demand for the two goods and are considering forming a free trade agreement. However, while this agreement received support from most voters in country A, many voters in country B were concerned that the agreement will likely widen income inequality in country B. Please identify which country is likely labor abundant and which...
Stolper-Samuelson theorem In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose a relatively capital-abundant country opens to trade. Who gains?...
Stolper-Samuelson theorem In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose a relatively capital-abundant country opens to trade. Who gains? Check all that apply. Multiple answers:You can select more than one option A: Workers B: Owners of capital C: The country as a whole
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT