Question

In: Math

How do I prove (step by step) Thales' Theorem?

How do I prove (step by step) Thales' Theorem?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Proof on Thales theorem :

If a line is drawn parallel to one side of a triangle and it intersects the other two sides at two distinct points then it divides the two sides in the same ratio.

Given : In ∆ABC , DE || BC and intersects AB in D and AC in E.

Prove that : AD / DB = AE / EC

Construction : Join BC,CD and draw EF ┴ BA and DG ┴ CA.

Statements

Reasons

1) EF ┴ BA
1) Construction
2) EF is the height of ∆ADE and ∆DBE
2) Definition of perpendicular
3)Area(∆ADE) = (AD .EF)/2
3)Area = (Base .height)/2
4)Area(∆DBE) =(DB.EF)/2
4) Area = (Base .height)/2
5)(Area(∆ADE))/(Area(∆DBE)) = AD/DB
5) Divide (4) by (5)
6) (Area(∆ADE))/(Area(∆DEC)) = AE/EC
6) Same as above
7) ∆DBE ~∆DEC
7) Both the ∆s are on the same base and
between the same || lines.
8) Area(∆DBE)=area(∆DEC)
8) If the two triangles are similar their
areas are equal
9) AD/DB =AE/EC
9) From (5) and (6) and (7)

Related Solutions

Prove the case involving ∨E(or elimination) of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for...
Prove the case involving ∨E(or elimination) of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural deduction in classical propositional logic. Hint: you need to simultaneously consider 3 different instances of entailment, 1 regular and 2 featuring the transformation of an assumption into a premise.
Prove the case involving ∨E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural...
Prove the case involving ∨E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural deduction in classical propositional logic. Hint: you need to simultaneously consider 3 different instances of entailment, 1 regular and 2 featuring the transformation of an assumption into a premise
Prove the case involving ¬E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural...
Prove the case involving ¬E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural deduction in classical propositional logic.
Prove the case involving ∨E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural...
Prove the case involving ∨E of the inductive step of the (strong) soundness theorem for natural deduction in classical propositional logic. Hint: you need to simultaneously consider 3 different instances of entailment, 1 regular and 2 featuring the transformation of an assumption into a premise.
Theorem two curves with the same intrinsic equation are necessary congruent I need prove this theorem...
Theorem two curves with the same intrinsic equation are necessary congruent I need prove this theorem with details and thanks
Can I get a Step by Step on how to do this problem Test the claim...
Can I get a Step by Step on how to do this problem Test the claim that the proportion of people who own cats is larger than 80% at the 0.005 significance level. The null and alternative hypothesis would be: H0:p≤0.8H0:p≤0.8 H1:p>0.8H1:p>0.8 H0:μ=0.8H0:μ=0.8 H1:μ≠0.8H1:μ≠0.8 H0:p≥0.8H0:p≥0.8 H1:p<0.8H1:p<0.8 H0:p=0.8H0:p=0.8 H1:p≠0.8H1:p≠0.8 H0:μ≥0.8H0:μ≥0.8 H1:μ<0.8H1:μ<0.8 H0:μ≤0.8H0:μ≤0.8 H1:μ>0.8H1:μ>0.8 The test is: right-tailed left-tailed two-tailed Based on a sample of 700 people, 82% owned cats The test statistic is:  (to 2 decimals) The p-value is:  (to 2 decimals) Based...
Prove Rolles Theorem
Prove Rolles Theorem
prove the Liouville's theorem?
prove the Liouville's theorem?
Casey’s theorem proof step by step
Casey’s theorem proof step by step
Prove the Heine-Borel Theorem
Prove the Heine-Borel Theorem
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT