Question

Suppose you are hired to assess the effectiveness of a cervical cancer screening program which is expected to have positive impacts on population health. Please explain which health economic evaluation you will use in your assessment and why.

Answer 1

Screening with HPV is more effective in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.

• Login
• Register

IMPACT FACTOR4.416

2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

in Oncology

Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

TOGGLE NAVIGATION

• ARTICLE ALERTS

THIS ARTICLE IS PART OF THE RESEARCH TOPIC

HPV Associated Cancers, Socio-Economic Disparity and Vaccination

Want to win $100,000 to host your own conference?

Suggest a Research Topic

• 10,178TOTAL VIEWS

REVIEW ARTICLE

Front. Oncol., 10 February 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00020

The possible effects on socio-economic inequalities of introducing HPV testing as primary test in cervical cancer screening programs

Paolo Giorgi Rossi1*, Flavia Baldacchini1 and Guglielmo Ronco2

• 1Servizio Interaziendale di Epidemiologia, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
• 2Unit of Cancer Epidemiology II, Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention (CPO), Turin, Italy

Background: Screening with HPV is more effective than Pap test in preventing cervical cancer. HPV as primary test will imply longer intervals and a triage test for HPV positive women. It will also permit the development of self-sampling devices. These innovations may affect population coverage, participation, and compliance to protocols, and likely in a different way for less educated, poorer, and disadvantaged women.

Aim: To describe the impact on inequalities, actual or presumed, of the introduction of HPV-based screening

Methods: The putative HPV-based screening algorithm has been analyzed to identify critical points for inequalities. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted searching PubMed on HPV screening coverage, participation, and compliance. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis.

Results: Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer was lower in women with low socio-economic status and in disadvantaged groups. A correct communication can reduce differences. Longer intervals will make it easier to achieve high-population coverage, but higher cost of the test in private providers could reduce the use of opportunistic screening by disadvantaged women. There are some evidences that inviting for HPV test instead of Pap increases participation, but there are no data on social differences. Self-sampling devices are effective in increasing participation and coverage. Some studies showed that the acceptability of self-sampling is higher in more educated women, but there is also an effect on hard-to-reach women. Communication of HPV positivity may increase anxiety and impact on sexual behaviors, the effect is stronger in low educated and disadvantaged women. Finally, many studies found indirect evidence that unvaccinated women are or will be more probably under-screened.

Conclusion: The introduction of HPV test may increase population coverage, but non-compliance to protocols and interaction with opportunistic screening can increase the existing inequalities.