In: Accounting
Case Application
Jack and Jane are married and own a home insured for $150,000 under an unendorsed HO-3 policy. The replacement cost of the home is $250,000. Personal property is insured for $75,000. Jane has jewelry valued at $10,000. Jack has a coin collection valued at $15,000 and a motorboat valued at $20,000.
a. Assume you are a financial planner who is asked to evaluate the couple’s HO-3 policy. Based on the facts given, do you believe that Jack and Jane’s coverages are adequate? If not, make several recommendations for improving the coverage.
b. A fire damaged one bedroom of the home. The actual cash value of the loss is $10,000. The cost of repairs is $16,000. How much will the insurer pay for the loss?
c. A burglar broke into the home and stole a new television, jewelry, and several paintings. The actual cash value of the stolen property is $4,000. The cost of replacing the property is $9,000. In addition, the coin collection was taken. Indicate the extent, if any, to which an unendorsed HO-3 policy will cover these losses.
d. Assume that Jack and Jane have a disagreement with their insurer concerning the value of the above losses. How would the dispute be resolved under their HO-3 policy?
e. Assume that Jane operates an accounting business from the home. Her home business office contains a computer used solely for business, office furniture, file cabinets, and other business personal property. Explain whether her HO-3 policy would cover business personal property used in a home business.
Given information,
home insured = $150,000
replacement cost of the home = $250,000
Personal property is insured = $75,000
jewelry valued = $10,000
coin collection = $15,000
motorboat valued = $20,000
a) :-
As a money related organizer I would recommends to expand the front of home protection as he is having a protection front of $150,000 while cost of substitution is $250,000 so he should build the front of home protection.
b) :-
Insurance agency pay $10,000 for the real misfortune happened not for the expense of substitution .
c) :-
Company will pay $4,000 for stolen articles equivalent to money esteem and $15,000 for accumulation of coin since its genuine esteem isn't given.
d) :-
Debate would be settled by the protection approach highlights and according to the directions of protection specialists.
e) :-
No ,
His business property from home would not be secured from home protection strategy and business misfortunes would not be secured so a different protection arrangement for business protection would be required .