In: Accounting
CASE STUDY
Adom Agencies, for many years, have relied on a single recruitment
method. That is, to advertise positions in
the Daily Graphic. Advertisements were placed in this publication
one time, and interested candidates were
instructed to contact the company to request an application
package. The application package included a letter
detailing how to apply for the job; a brochure about the company;
an application form; and a copy of the
company’s development plan for the next three years. Other local
companies in the area also used the Daily
Graphic for recruitment, but in addition, they placed
advertisements in other local newspapers as well as on a
web site for their vacancies. Some even launched a page on their
organisation’s web site to enable candidates
to download all of the application information.
As part of the selection process, candidates submitted an
application form along with contact information for
two people who could provide references, and returned the
information to the appropriate department head.
Once the closing date had passed, designated staff members reviewed
the applications independently and graded
them A, B or C (where A is the highest mark and C is the lowest)
based on the candidate’s ability to meet the
selection criteria. The panel would then convene to discuss the
A-rated application forms and agree on a list of
candidates who would be invited to attend a selection day. The
staff members assessing the applications were
usually heads of departments from the relevant subject area.
Training was not offered to panel members to help
them to select the best candidates. Before the selection day,
references would be requested for all candidates.
Copies of the references would be provided to interview panel
members; employment offers were based on the
receipt of satisfactory references.
The agenda for the selection shows that the organization relied on
two selection methods for all of their
vacancies—an informal and formal interview. The first (informal)
interview was led by the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and an administrator. This was used to learn basic
information about the candidate and to review
the information on the application form. The second interview was
more detailed and explored a wide range of
issues with the candidates. The panel consisted of the CEO, HR
manager, Head of Department and a Senior
Officer. Due to time constraints, panel members were usually unable
to meet in advance, so they developed
their interview questions independently. Although the CEO chaired
the interviews, they were rarely carried out
in the same manner and the questions lacked a high level of
consistency. Also, no formal scoring system was
used. At the end of the interviews, there was a panel vote to see
which candidate should be offered the job. This
often led to a heated debate about candidate strengths and
weaknesses.
Required:
a. Suggest two (2) alternative sources of recruitment that will
ensure that the best candidates are recruited.
Please explain your choices. [5 Marks]
b. Judging from the case, in what ways can the selection process be
improved? [10 Marks]
c. Discuss five (5) biases you can identify about the selection
process of Adom Agencies.
[5 Marks]