In: Economics
Briefly describe Evolutionary Psychology and then discuss its contributions to Behavioral Economics
Economics and Evolutionary Psychology
by David Friedman
Economics is built on a simple assumption—that individual
behavior can best be predicted by assuming that each individual
will take the actions that best achieve his objectives. The
justification for that assumption, somewhat misleadingly labeled
“rationality,” is that we have no good theory of mistakes, no way
of predicting what particular irrational action an individual will
take. That leaves the rational element as the best—although
imperfect—way of predicting behavior.
Evolutionary psychology offers, among other things, a theory of
mistakes—an alternative to the rationality assumption. In this
essay I sketch out the nature of that theory, describe some puzzles
that economics has a difficult time explaining, and try to show how
modifying economics with the aid of evolutionary psychology might
help explain them.
Evolutionary Psychology: The Short Version
Evolutionary psychology[2] starts from two simple
assumptions:
The human mind is best understood not as a general purpose
computer but as a set of specialized software modules, each
designed to deal with a particular subset of problems.
Those programs have been designed by Darwinian evolution to
produce reproductive success in our environment of evolutionary
adaptiveness—the hunter-gatherer environment in which our species
spent most of its species history.
Researchers in evolutionary psychology, starting with these
assumptions, have generated and tested predictions ranging from
differences in male and female special abilities to the timing of
morning sickness.
Three important points are worth making about the second assumption
in order to avoid misunderstanding. The first is that the
assumption is not that individuals seek reproductive success—if we
were doing that, the population of developed countries would be
increasing much faster than it is—but only that we have those
psychological characteristics that produced reproductive success in
the environment we evolved in. The second is that reproductive
success is an objective for the individual, not the group or
species. Most scholars in evolutionary biology accept the view that
traits which benefit group or species at the cost of the individual
who carries them will be selected out.
The third point is that we are adapted not to the world we now live
in but to the environment in which our species spent most of its
history. Agriculture is a recent development. We would expect most
of our characteristics to be designed to produce reproductive
success in the environment in which our species spent most of its
evolutionary history—believed to be an environment of small
hunter-gatherer bands.
What is Behavioral Economics
Behavioral Economics is the study of psychology as it relates to the economic decision-making processes of individuals and institutions. The two most important questions in this field are:
1. Are economists' assumptions of utility or profit maximization good approximations of real people's behavior?
2. Do individuals maximize subjective expected utility?
Behavioral economics is often related with normative economics.
BREAKING DOWN Behavioral Economics
In an ideal world, people would always make optimal decisions that provide them with the greatest benefit and satisfaction. In economics, rational choice theory states that when humans are presented with various options under the conditions of scarcity, they would choose the option that maximizes their individual satisfaction. This theory assumes that people, given their preferences and constraints, are capable of making rational decisions by effectively weighing the costs and benefits of each option available to them. The final decision made will be the best choice for the individual. The rational person has self-control and is unmoved by emotions and external factors and, hence, knows what is best for himself. Alas behavioral economics explains that humans are not rational and are incapable of making good decisions.
Behavioral economics draws on psychology and economics to explore why people sometimes make irrational decisions, and why and how their behavior does not follow the predictions of economic models. Decisions such as how much to pay for a cup of coffee, whether to go to graduate school, whether to pursue a healthy lifestyle, how much to contribute towards retirement, etc. are the sorts of decisions that most people make at some point in their lives. Behavioral economics seeks to explain why an individual decided to go for choice A, instead of choice B.
Because humans are emotional and easily distracted beings, they make decisions that are not in their self-interest. For example, according to the rational choice theory, if Charles wants to lose weight and is equipped with information about the number of calories available in each edible product, he will opt only for the food products with minimal calories. Behavioral economics states that even if Charles wants to lose weight and sets his mind on eating healthy food going forward, his end behavior will be subject to cognitive bias, emotions, and social influences. If a commercial on TV advertises a brand of ice cream at an attractive price and quotes that all human beings need 2,000 calories a day to function effectively after all, the mouth-watering ice cream image, price, and seemingly valid statistics may lead Charles to fall into the sweet temptation and fall out of the weight loss bandwagon, showing his lack of self-control.