In: Accounting
Single Plantwide Rate and Activity-Based Costing
Whirlpool Corporation conducted an activity-based costing study of its Evansville, Indiana, plant in order to identify its most profitable products. Assume that we select three representative refrigerators (out of 333): one low-, one medium-, and one high-volume refrigerator. Additionally, we assume the following activity-base information for each of the three refrigerators:
Three Representative Refrigerators |
Number of Machine Hours |
Number of Setups |
Number of Sales Orders |
Number of Units |
||||
Refrigerator—Low Volume | 120 | 17 | 51 | 600 | ||||
Refrigerator—Medium Volume | 350 | 16 | 113 | 1,750 | ||||
Refrigerator—High Volume | 1,050 | 11 | 170 | 5,250 |
Prior to conducting the study, the factory overhead allocation was based on a single machine hour rate. The machine hour rate was $600 per hour. After conducting the activity-based costing study, assume that three activities were used to allocate the factory overhead. The new activity rate information is assumed to be as follows:
Machining Activity |
Setup Activity |
Sales Order Processing Activity |
|||||
Activity rate | $580 | $900 | $200 |
a. Complete the following table, using the single machine hour rate to determine the per-unit factory overhead for each refrigerator (Column A) and the three activity-based rates to determine the activity-based factory overhead per unit (Column B). Finally, compute the percent change in per-unit allocation from the single to activity-based rate methods (Column C).
If required, round all per unit answers to the nearest cent. Round percents to one decimal place. For column C, use the minus sign to indicate a negative or decrease.
Column A | Column B | Column C | |
Product Volume Class |
Single Rate Overhead Allocation Per Unit |
ABC Overhead Allocation Per Unit |
Percent Change in Allocation |
Low | |||
Medium | |||
High |
Answer :-
Overhead based on single absorption rate of machine hours | |||||||||
Product volume class | Number of product | Machine hours | Overhead rate | Total Overheads | Cost per unit | ||||
Low | 600 | 120 | 600 | 72,000 | 120 | ||||
Medium | 1,750 | 350 | 600 | 210,000 | 120 | ||||
High | 5,250 | 1,050 | 600 | 630,000 | 120 | ||||
Overhead based on ABC Costing | |||||||||
Product volume class | Number of product | Machine hours | Number of setupts | Number of orders | Machining Cost | Setup Cost | Sales Order Cost | Total Overheads | Cost per unit |
(@580 per hour) | (@900 per setup) | (@200 pe order) | |||||||
Low | 600 | 120 | 17 | 51 | 69,600 | 15,300 | 10,200 | 95,100 | 158.50 |
Medium | 1,750 | 350 | 16 | 113 | 203,000 | 14,400 | 22,600 | 240,000 | 137.14 |
High | 5,250 | 1,050 | 11 | 170 | 609,000 | 9,900 | 34,000 | 652,900 |
124.36 |
Diffrential Cost | |||||||||
Product volume class | Cost as per Single rate | Cost as per ABC | Percent change in Allocation | ||||||
Per unit | Per unit | ||||||||
Low | 120 | 158.50 | 32.10% | ||||||
Medium | 120 | 137.14 | 14.28% | ||||||
High | 120 | 124.63 | 3.86% | ||||||