In: Economics
Argument in favor of USA enacting
barriers to imports:
The barriers to import, will help the industries in the nascent
stage to grow and become competent in some time to compete with the
foreign players. These industries will get protection and
employment to people will also be preserved when barriers to import
are applied. People are bound to purchase the goods & services
from these developing industries and the firms will grow
stronger.
Argument against the USA enacting barriers to imports:
Giving protection to the industries bring complacency, higher price
and poor quality of products and services. Further, higher expenses
upon the goods produced by the protected industries, reduces the
demand for other products produced by the other industries. So,
jobs decrease in other industries in the name of protection to some
industries. So, there is only a redistribution of job rather
increase in jobs.
In following situations, barriers help to develop export
power:
1. When the products are of high quality, lower price
and differentiated I the international market.
2. Monopoly in the international market
3. Top in the value chain where the other components
follow it.
4. Domestic industries grow at a faster pace
When the economies operate at the same level in the international
market, and one government prohibits the entry of firms from other
countries as import barrier, then other countries take the similar
measure against the country and put trade restrictions against that
country. International trade takes place on a mutual basis where
import and export both are allowed as a part of a trade
agreement.
For example, the case of demand of import duties upon some of the
components, required to produce solar panel in the USA is
considered as trade barrier that is threatening to the US solar
panel industry.
Reference:
A protectionist trade ruling threatens America’s solar industry. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com
Full web URL cannot be given due to the answering board guidelines.