Question

Especially during economic down times, organisations may have to reduce headcount. The negative effects on those who remain are well documented and include increased sickness absence, withdrawal from work tasks, intentions to sue the organisation ,stress, dissatisfaction, and loss of commitments. Do employers have a responsibility to help the cushion blow of downsizing? While ethicist debate how much organizations should help laid off employees, they agree that firms can afford to do something probably should. Managing layoffs with an eye to the organisation’s reputation may also be important for hiring new employees when economic prospects improve. So keeping in view the concept of downsizing give some suggestions to minimize the negative impact of downsizing on employees Especially during economic down times, organisations may have to reduce headcount. The negative effects on those who remain are well documented and include increased sickness absence, withdrawal from work tasks, intentions to sue the organisation ,stress, dissatisfaction, and loss of commitments. Do employers have a responsibility to help the cushion blow of downsizing? While ethicist debate how much organizations should help laid off employees, they agree that firms can afford to do something probably should. Managing layoffs with an eye to the organisation’s reputation may also be important for hiring new employees when economic prospects improve. So keeping in view the concept of downsizing give some suggestions to minimize the negative impact of downsizing on employees? Especially during economic down times, organisations may have to reduce headcount. The negative effects on those who remain are well documented and include increased sickness absence, withdrawal from work tasks, intentions to sue the organisation ,stress, dissatisfaction, and loss of commitments. Do employers have a responsibility to help the cushion blow of downsizing? While ethicist debate how much organizations should help laid off employees, they agree that firms can afford to do something probably should. Managing layoffs with an eye to the organisation’s reputation may also be important for hiring new employees when economic prospects improve. So keeping in view the concept of downsizing give some suggestions to minimize the negative impact of downsizing on employees Especially during economic down times, organisations may have to reduce headcount. The negative effects on those who remain are well documented and include increased sickness absence, withdrawal from work tasks, intentions to sue the organisation ,stress, dissatisfaction, and loss of commitments. Do employers have a responsibility to help the cushion blow of downsizing? While ethicist debate how much organizations should help laid off employees, they agree that firms can afford to do something probably should. Managing layoffs with an eye to the organisation’s reputation may also be important for hiring new employees when economic prospects improve. So keeping in view the concept of downsizing give some suggestions to minimize the negative impact of downsizing on employees

Answer 1

Answer :

Most firms believe that it is not easy to let their employees go, calling employees to the conference room and telling them that their livelihoods have been removed. It is not merely a degree of rigor, with which many managers are not comfortable, but it does not help firms to reduce their size practically without a plan. In the best interest of a company, it is not only humane to help employees lay down. Outplacement Services are one way of reducing the blow of being axed as part of a business decision. Organizations also use this as a means to support people who have been or may be fired or terminated in their employment and financially. Companies can adopt below strategies to help employees during the cushion blow of downsizing:

1. To reduce the bitterness between the outgoing employees, the company reduces the chances of problems of liability.

2. Burning bridges is never a good practice. Companies recall their previous employees is not uncommon.

3. Decide on a specific contact or layoff rationale. Be consistent in your thinking and stress that the decision has not been made lightly. Every manager will send the same message throughout the business.

4. Give your staff training, if necessary, to adapt to new job requirements they may be faced with after leaving.

5. You should make sure workers are successful during the necessary working hours until the company declines. You'll want to focus on constructive action that will keep workers involved after condensing the workforce.

6. Letters for severance make a source of income for a sudden loss of livelihoods. You claim that after spending years in a company, you can not buy loyalty but you can make a price for your job to quit.

7. Please let the staff know that following layoff issues or complaints may be answered by their supervisors. Offer to meet one at a time for any employees to hear their opinions and concerns.

Problems of cash flow, inadequate results on the stock market, or low-profit margins often contribute to decisions being reduced. Regardless of the desire to reform, the reduction must be carried out specifically to avoid negative effects on company and employee values.

1. When companies downsize, workload gaps are created. It also increases workloads and pressure on employees who remain. It increases strain for the majority of the staff not only to complete their current duties but also to work with them to pay them. Additional duties will create a burden on remaining workers and adversely affect the morale and morale of the team in addition to their current ones.

2.Loss of trust and protection among workers who are in downsizing times. The fired workers experience anxiety for obvious reasons because they are pressured to leave the company to find other jobs. The other employees can also fight to reduce their size. If your work has not stopped, it may be a disruptive realization to know that your company is prepared to lay down employees to reduce costs.

3. Employee elimination retains knowledge that is frequently lost during downsizing. Problems, consumer needs, operational strategies, and company history are some of the information fields that have been lost during the restructuring process. If you say to an employee that you are losing your job as part of a reduction, he can become depressed. He will unfavorably compare himself to colleagues who would stay with the company and lose faith. An employee may also be angry at the company because they decide to reject it. This rage can become resentment over time.

4. The positioning of workers shall be removed during a reduction, but the volume of work remains typically standardized. Remaining workers have extra responsibilities and requirements, which may influence the amount of work to be done. At first, employees may be more productive as they still have work, but work stress increases rapidly and the productivity boost can be reduced.

5. Downsizing is one of the reasons triggering a decline in workplace productivity. The workplace climate is less innovative and workers do not take as many bold and imaginative steps as possible in their jobs. In some situations, employees may reserve ideas if they too are small or want to move to another business. Higher innovation also leads to lower profitability and fewer new ideas to ensure the competitiveness of your business.

**** It seems the same paragraph is pasted many times. I have found 2 relevant questions in this paragraph. Kindly LIKE the answer. It will help and motivate me. ****