In: Statistics and Probability
What are the differences between a qualitative research design verses a quantitative research design?
When would it be appropriate to use one design over another in investigating a business process problem? For example, a toothpaste company wants to find out what the demand for a tooth whitening gel is among male customers between the ages of 30–40 years. What research design would be appropriate for the company to use?
Please don't hesitate to give a "thumbs up" in case you're satisfied with the answer
I have tabulated differences between the 2 types of researches here:
Qualitative Research | Quantitative Research |
Qualitative research is the research where researcher relies on the views of the participants | Quantitative research is the research where researcher decides what to do and what not to |
It is conducted to explore the situation and find out any new concepts, theories or phenomena | It is conducted to explain or prove the theories |
Common research objective is to explore and gain understanding of the problems or reasons | Common research objective is to describe, explain and quantify the problem |
Research questions include ‘How’ and ‘Why’ | Research questions include ‘What’ and ‘When’ |
Scientific method of research is Exploratory
i.e. bottom-up, where new hypothesis or theories are generated from the collected data |
Scientific method of research is Confirmatory
i.e. top-down, where the researcher will test hypothesis from the collected data |
It follows Inductive reasoning method (looking for emergence of
any theory)
i.e. Starts from Observation, then we find out the Pattern, make the Tentative hypothesis and finally form the Theory |
It follows Deductive reasoning method (fitting data in
theories)
i.e. Starts from the Theory, from which we form Hypothesis, make the Observation and finally confirm our Hypothesis |
Data collected are more in words and images | Data collected are more in numbers and statistics |
Data collection methods are mainly In-depth Interviews (IDI), Focus Group Discussion (FGD), observation and document reviews | Data collection methods are mainly structured interviews, surveys, statistical records |
There are multiple ways of reaching from point A (start) to point B (end) | There are specific/certain ways of reaching from point A (start) to point B (end) |
Sampling is mostly ‘non-random sampling’ | Sampling is mostly ‘random sampling’ |
It gives more information of limited cases | It gives limited information of more cases |
It is considered to have wide angle range | It is considered to have narrow angle lens |
It can have methodological innovations | It cannot have methodological innovations |
Study of the whole subject is done | Only specific variables are studied here |
Data collection is less structured | Data collection is more structured |
Sample size is not an important issue | Sample size is an important issue |
The Inquiry is process oriented | Inquiry is result oriented |
No statistical tests required | Statistical tests are necessary to prove the hypothesis |
Hypothesis is generated here | Hypothesis is tested here |
Findings are less generalizable | Findings are more generalizable |
Results are very descriptive | Results are quite specific |
Report of qualitative researches are narrative including direct quotation of the participants | Report of quantitative researches are more statistical showing the relationship between the variables |
Challenges in analyzing data:
· Small sample size · Large volume of data · Researchers bias · Creative process |
Challenges in analyzing data:
· Good statistical analysis required · More sample size required to generalize or the analysis will be of less importance |
Answer to 2nd part:
All evidence that the research is more "structured" and that the sample group of study is more defined Points out the fact that the research design is Quantative Research