Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Here are some real statistics for various countries in 2003: per capita income vs. per capita...

Here are some real statistics for various countries in 2003: per capita income vs. per capita recorded music sales:

Country                      Per Cap. Income Per Cap. Music

                                   ($ thousands)             Sales ($)

Norway                      42.4                     55.9

United Kingdom          30.9                     53.35

United States              42.0                     40.43

Australia                     32.9                     33.84

Switzerland                 35.3                     34.40

Finland                       30.6                     26.98

Canada                      32.9                     20.79

United Arab Emirates        29.1                     11.33

Greece                            22.8                     8.10

Israel                               22.3                     6.68

Czech Republic                 18.1                     3.96

South Africa                     12.1                     3.75

South Korea                      20.4                     3.34

Mexico 10.1                     3.30

Egypt                                4.4                   0.15

Indonesia                          3.7                   0.33

4a) Which variable should be considered the dependent (y) variable, and which the independent (x) variable?

4b) According to this model, if a country’s income improves by $3,000, how much to you expect music sales to increase by?

4c) What is the correlation coefficient? Is it statistically significant? How strong is this model?

4d) Why do you think the correlation is as high as it is?

4e) If a region of country has a per-capita income of $25,000, predict its per-capita music sales.

4f) Looking at the U.S, Canada. & Europe only, delete the United Arab Emirates, South Africa, South Korea Mexico, Egypt, and Indonesia from the model. Answer 3b, 3c, and 3e again.

4g) Why might it have been OK to throw away the countries we did in part f?

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Why are some countries rich with high per capita income and some countries poor with Low...
Why are some countries rich with high per capita income and some countries poor with Low per capita income?
Research data on the number of computers per capita in various countries of the world. Show...
Research data on the number of computers per capita in various countries of the world. Show how a newspaper could present the data in a way that misleads readers into believing that Canada is far behind other countries.
It is found that the real GDP per capita of developing countries grows faster than developed...
It is found that the real GDP per capita of developing countries grows faster than developed countries at the same period. Explain this phenomenon in the light of diminishing returns to capital.
In 2008 the real per capita income in an industrially advanced Country A was about $37,665...
In 2008 the real per capita income in an industrially advanced Country A was about $37,665 per year. The average real per capita income in low-income developing Country B was about $925 per year. (a) What is the gap in the average standards of living between Country A and Country B based on their per capita income?    b). If real per capita income of Country B is to grow at an average annual rate of 7 %, using the...
Some countries in the world have a higher levels of GDP per capita than others. With...
Some countries in the world have a higher levels of GDP per capita than others. With this knowledge, discuss the factors that are responsible for causing economic growth.
“Convergence in growth rates and income per capita across the different countries is a necessary outcome...
“Convergence in growth rates and income per capita across the different countries is a necessary outcome expected by both the neoclassical Solow growth model and the endogenous growth theory. “Is this statement true? (Discuss the issue by giving references to the fundamental premises of these two theories). Looking at the real-life data, has the convergence hypothesis been validated in the world? Explain.
2. Switzerland has a per capita income of $50,000, Russia has a per capita income of...
2. Switzerland has a per capita income of $50,000, Russia has a per capita income of $20,000, China has a per capita income of $8,000 and Liberia has a per capita income of $500. (4 points) a. If the growth rate is 1.5% in Switzerland, 3.5% in Russia, 9% in China and 20% in Liberia, in which country is there the largest absolute increase in per capita income (absolute = in nominal value / in $)? (1 point) Switzerland                  ...
The average per Growth Rates of Real, per capita GDP between 2000 and 2008 in Low-income...
The average per Growth Rates of Real, per capita GDP between 2000 and 2008 in Low-income and Middle-income countries where 4.7% and 6.1% respectively. This observation is consistent with the Convergence hypothesis.
Real GDP per capita tells us the average level of income (and expenditure) for a person...
Real GDP per capita tells us the average level of income (and expenditure) for a person in the economy. While countries with higher levels of GDP per capita tend to enjoy better healthcare, higher levels of life expectancy or higher average years of schooling (to mention a few), compared to countries with low levels of real GDP per capita, many still argue that this is an imperfect measure of the true level of well-being for members of an economy. Explain...
Per capita income depends on the savings rate of the country: e.g. countries who save more...
Per capita income depends on the savings rate of the country: e.g. countries who save more end up with a higher standard of living. To test this theory, you collect data from the Penn World Tables on GDP per worker relative to the United States (RelProd) in 1990 and the average investment share of GDP from 1980-1990 (SK), remembering that investment equals saving. The regression results (using heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors) are: RelProd = −0.08 + 2.44 ×SK , R2 =...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT