In: Statistics and Probability
An SAT prep course claims to improve the test score of students. The table below shows the scores for seven students the first two times they took the verbal SAT. Before taking the SAT for the second time, each student took a course to try to improve his or her verbal SAT scores. Do these results support the claim that the SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores?
Let d=(verbal SAT scores prior to taking the prep course)−(verbal SAT scores after taking the prep course)d=(verbal SAT scores prior to taking the prep course)−(verbal SAT scores after taking the prep course). Use a significance level of α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the verbal SAT scores are normally distributed for the population of students both before and after taking the SAT prep course.
Student | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score on first SAT | 530 | 410 | 380 | 600 | 480 | 440 | 380 |
Score on second SAT | 560 | 460 | 400 | 620 | 500 | 520 | 430 |
Step 1 of 5: State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.
Step 2 of 5: Find the value of the standard deviation of the paired differences. Round your answer to one decimal place
Step 3 of 5: Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.
Step 4 of 5: Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0. Round the numerical portion of your answer to three decimal places.
Reject H0 if (t, ItI) (<,>) ____________
Step 5 of 5: Make the decision for the hypothesis test. (Reject or Fail to Reject Null Hypothesis)
Sample size, n =7
Student | Score on first SAT | Score on second SAT | Difference: d |
1 | 530 | 560 | -30 |
2 | 410 | 460 | -50 |
3 | 380 | 400 | -20 |
4 | 600 | 620 | -20 |
5 | 480 | 500 | -20 |
6 | 440 | 520 | -80 |
7 | 380 | 430 | -50 |
Total | -270 |
Paired sample t-test:
Step 1 of 5:
Null Hypothesis(H0):
Alternative Hypothesis(H1): (left-tailed test).
(where, =Population mean of verbal SAT scores prior to taking the prep course; =Population mean of verbal SAT scores after taking the prep course).
Step 2 of 5:
Sample mean of the differences, -270/7 = -38.5714
Sample std.deviation of the differences, Sd = =22.7
So, the value of the standard deviation of the paired differences =22.7
Standard Error, SE =Sd/ =22.7/ =8.5798
Step 3 of 5:
Test statistic, t =( - 0)/SE =(-38.5714 - 0)/8.5798 = -4.4956
Step 4 of 5:
Decision rule:
Reject H0 if ItI > |t-critical|
t-critical at 0.01 significance level and at df =n - 1 =6 for a left-tailed test is: t-critical = -3.143
So, reject H0 if ItI > |-3.143|, i.e., if |t| > 3.143
Step 5 of 5:
Decision for the hypothesis test:
Reject the Null Hypothesis at 0.01 significance level since 4.4956 > 3.143
Thus, we have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the SAT prep course improves the students' verbal SAT scores.