In: Statistics and Probability
The data below are for the number of unemployed persons (in millions) and the federal unemployment insurance payments (in billions of dollars) for the years 2010 – 2017. Some economists state that these two variables are positively related, and that the amount of federal unemployment insurance payments can be used to predict the number of unemployed persons.
Year |
||||||||
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
|
Federal Unemployment Insurance Payments |
11.8 |
10.7 |
18.0 |
19.7 |
23.7 |
31.5 |
18.4 |
16.8 |
# of Unemployed Persons |
6.2 |
6.1 |
7.6 |
8.3 |
10.7 |
10.7 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
Assume that a simple linear regression model is appropriate for these data. You can do the calculations manually, or use a statistical software package (e.g., Excel) to conduct a least squares regression analysis. Make sure to check your data entry, as any errors will automatically make all of your answers incorrect! Conduct the appropriate t-test at α = .05 to determine whether the amount of federal unemployment insurance payments is a useful predictor of the number of unemployed persons.
The critical value for rejecting the most obvious H0 is (Click to select)±+- . (Report your answer to 3 decimal places, using conventional rounding rules)
The value of the test statistic is (Click to select)+-± . (Report your answer to 2 decimal places, using conventional rounding rules)
Should the most obvious null hypothesis be rejected? (Click to select)noyescannot be determined from the information provided
Can you conclude that the amount of federal unemployment insurance payments is a useful predictor of the number of unemployed persons. (Click to select)nocannot be determined from the information providedyes
What is the correlation between the independent and dependent variables for this simple linear regression analysis? (Negative values must include the minus sign. Report your answer to 2 decimal places, using conventional rounding rules.)
SUMMARY OUTPUT | |||||
Regression Statistics | |||||
Multiple R | 0.932702 | ||||
R Square | 0.869932 | ||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.848254 | ||||
Standard Error | 0.679515 | ||||
Observations | 8 | ||||
ANOVA | |||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | |
Regression | 1 | 18.52956 | 18.52956 | 40.12981 | 0.000724 |
Residual | 6 | 2.770443 | 0.461741 | ||
Total | 7 | 21.3 | |||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | |
Intercept | 3.663917 | 0.770267 | 4.756684 | 0.003137 | 1.779141 |
x | 0.246273 | 0.038876 | 6.334809 | 0.000724 | 0.151146 |
=========================================
=========================================
=========================================
=========================================
Yes
Yes, it is a good predictor
==========================================